Jp Bids MCP Server

jp-bids-mcp npm v0.9.0 Source verified

Published by sugukurukabe — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

日本の官公需入札情報をMCPで検索・分析。Japan government procurement bid search and AI analysis through the Model Context Protocol.

View on npm ↗ Repository ↗ Raw report (JSON) ↗

Trust grade

100/100

Last scanned 2026-09-07 get badge →

Trust

A · 100/100

Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.

Capability

Minimal

Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.

Coverage

Source

How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.

A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 100/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 0 = 100. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

✓ No adoption-risk deductions — minimal blast radius, verified enough, and fully inspected.

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 20

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

analyze_award_price_impactno sensitive capability
analyze_past_awardsno sensitive capability
assess_bid_qualificationno sensitive capability
check_saved_searchno sensitive capability
create_bid_calendarno sensitive capability
create_bid_review_packetno sensitive capability
draft_bid_questionsno sensitive capability
explain_bid_fitno sensitive capability
export_bid_shortlistno sensitive capability
extract_bid_requirementsno sensitive capability

Show 10 more tools ↓

get_bid_detailno sensitive capability
get_listed_award_historyno sensitive capability
list_recent_bidsno sensitive capability
list_saved_searchesno sensitive capability
map_awards_to_listedno sensitive capability
rank_bidsno sensitive capability
save_searchno sensitive capability
search_bidsno sensitive capability
summarize_bids_by_orgno sensitive capability
watch_listed_awardsno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Tools were statically extracted from the published source (20 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

Version	Score	Engine	Scanned
`v0.9.0` latest	A 100/100	1.13.0	2026-09-07
`v0.8.0`	A 100/100	1.13.0	2026-08-29
`v0.7.2`	A 99/100	1.10.0	2026-07-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

Markdown (GitHub README)

[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jp-bids-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jp-bids-mcp)

HTML

<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jp-bids-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jp-bids-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>

Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jp-bids-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan jp-bids-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Data Science & ML

2sio Source verified npm

@2sio/mcp

MCP server for 2s.io — 575+ pay-per-call tools for AI agents — ground-truth data, AI gateway, and agent infra (storage, locks, queues, watchers). x402 USDC on Base/Solana, no API keys, upto usage billing, free trials.

Data Science & ML Score 100/100 0 findings 327/wk Cap. Minimal

Academic Research Mcp Server Remote

https://nexgendata-mcp-proxy.steve-corbeil.workers.dev/academic-research-mcp-server/mcp

ArXiv preprints + Google Scholar papers, with citation counts in one query.

Data Science & ML Score 100/100 0 findings Cap. Minimal

Add Source verified npm

add-mcp

Add MCP servers to your favorite coding agents with a single command.

Data Science & ML Score 100/100 0 findings 149k/wk Cap. Minimal

Addon Source verified npm

@storybook/addon-mcp

Help agents automatically write and test stories for your UI components