Jamfmcp MCP Server

jamfmcp PyPI v1.0.2

Published by liquidz00 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/jamfmcp/cli.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/jamfmcp/cli.py:68`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run(["uv", "--version"], capture_output=True, text=True) return result.return

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/jamfmcp/cli.py

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_advanced_computer_search_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_advanced_computer_searchesno sensitive capability
  • get_basic_diagnosticsno sensitive capability
  • get_building_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_buildingsno sensitive capability
  • get_categoriesno sensitive capability
  • get_category_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_compliance_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_computer_historyno sensitive capability
  • get_computer_inventoryno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • get_configuration_profilesno sensitive capability
  • get_cvesno sensitive capability
  • get_department_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_departmentsno sensitive capability
  • get_device_lock_pinno sensitive capability
  • get_directory_binding_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_directory_bindingsno sensitive capability
  • get_extension_attributesno sensitive capability
  • get_group_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_health_scorecardno sensitive capability
  • get_jcds_filesno sensitive capability
  • get_ldap_server_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_ldap_serversno sensitive capability
  • get_licensed_softwareno sensitive capability
  • get_licensed_software_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_network_segment_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_network_segmentsno sensitive capability
  • get_package_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_packagesno sensitive capability
  • get_patch_policiesno sensitive capability
  • get_patch_software_title_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_patch_software_titlesno sensitive capability
  • get_policiesno sensitive capability
  • get_policy_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_profile_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_restricted_softwareno sensitive capability
  • get_restricted_software_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_script_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_scriptsno sensitive capability
  • get_site_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_sitesno sensitive capability
  • get_smart_groupsno sensitive capability
  • get_user_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_user_group_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_usersno sensitive capability
  • get_webhook_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_webhooksno sensitive capability
  • pingno sensitive capability
  • search_computersno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.2 latest A 93/100 1 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jamfmcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jamfmcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jamfmcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jamfmcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/jamfmcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan jamfmcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools