Apidog (ivanherula) MCP Server
@ivanherula/apidog-mcp-server
npm
v0.1.2
Published by @ivanherula — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
MCP server for Apidog API specs and test management
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 2 = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 36
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
bulk_create_test_casesno sensitive capabilitycreate_scenario_folderno sensitive capabilitycreate_suite_folderno sensitive capabilitycreate_test_caseno sensitive capabilitycreate_test_datano sensitive capabilitycreate_test_scenariono sensitive capabilitycreate_test_suiteno sensitive capabilitydelete_scenario_folderno sensitive capabilitydelete_suite_folderno sensitive capabilitydelete_test_caseno sensitive capability
Show 26 more tools ↓
delete_test_datano sensitive capabilitydelete_test_scenariono sensitive capabilitydelete_test_suiteno sensitive capabilityexport_openapino sensitive capabilityget_endpoint_statisticsno sensitive capabilityget_test_caseno sensitive capabilityget_test_datano sensitive capabilityget_test_scenario_stepsno sensitive capabilityget_test_suiteno sensitive capabilityimport_endpointno sensitive capabilityimport_endpoints_from_urlno sensitive capabilityimport_openapino sensitive capabilityimport_schemano sensitive capabilitylist_endpointsno sensitive capabilitylist_environmentsno sensitive capabilitylist_runnersno sensitive capabilitylist_test_case_categoriesno sensitive capabilitylist_test_case_tagsno sensitive capabilitylist_test_casesno sensitive capabilitylist_test_datano sensitive capabilitylist_test_scenariosno sensitive capabilitylist_test_suitesno sensitive capabilityupdate_test_caseno sensitive capabilityupdate_test_datano sensitive capabilityupdate_test_scenario_stepsno sensitive capabilityupdate_test_suiteno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (36 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.2 latest |
A 98/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @ivanherula/apidog-mcp-server --onlineOther implementations of Apidog 3
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 4 side by side →
MCP server for navigating and editing Apidog projects through undocumented Apidog APIs. (in development)
MCP server for managing Apidog API documentation — import, export, diff, cases, schemas, bulk ops, analysis, and more.
The **Apidog MCP Server** allows you to use your API documentation from Apidog projects as a data source for AI-powered IDEs like **Cursor**. This means Agentic AI can directly access and work with your API documentation, speeding up development and makin
More in Developer Tools
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.