Mitre Attack (imouiche) MCP Server

@imouiche/mitre-attack-mcp-server npm v0.1.4

Published by @imouiche — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Complete MCP server for MITRE ATT&CK threat intelligence framework with 50+ tools

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (run.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`run.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: st { spawn } = require('child_process'); const path = require('path'); // Set PYTHONPATH to include src directory const

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server run.js

Tools 65

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • generate_layerno sensitive capability
  • get_all_assetsno sensitive capability
  • get_all_campaignsno sensitive capability
  • get_all_datacomponentsno sensitive capability
  • get_all_datasourcesno sensitive capability
  • get_all_groupsno sensitive capability
  • get_all_matricesno sensitive capability
  • get_all_mitigationsno sensitive capability
  • get_all_parent_techniquesno sensitive capability
  • get_all_softwareno sensitive capability
Show 55 more tools ↓
  • get_all_subtechniquesno sensitive capability
  • get_all_tacticsno sensitive capability
  • get_all_techniquesno sensitive capability
  • get_assets_targeted_by_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_attack_idno sensitive capability
  • get_campaigns_attributed_to_groupno sensitive capability
  • get_campaigns_by_aliasno sensitive capability
  • get_campaigns_using_softwareno sensitive capability
  • get_campaigns_using_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_data_statsno sensitive capability
  • get_datacomponents_detecting_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_group_by_nameno sensitive capability
  • get_group_techniquesno sensitive capability
  • get_groups_attributing_to_campaignno sensitive capability
  • get_groups_by_aliasno sensitive capability
  • get_groups_using_softwareno sensitive capability
  • get_groups_using_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_layer_metadatano sensitive capability
  • get_mitigations_mitigating_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_nameno sensitive capability
  • get_object_by_attack_idno sensitive capability
  • get_object_by_stix_idno sensitive capability
  • get_objects_by_contentno sensitive capability
  • get_objects_by_nameno sensitive capability
  • get_objects_by_typeno sensitive capability
  • get_objects_created_afterno sensitive capability
  • get_objects_modified_afterno sensitive capability
  • get_parent_technique_of_subtechniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_procedure_examples_by_tacticno sensitive capability
  • get_procedure_examples_by_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_revoked_techniquesno sensitive capability
  • get_softwareno sensitive capability
  • get_software_by_aliasno sensitive capability
  • get_software_used_by_campaignno sensitive capability
  • get_software_used_by_groupno sensitive capability
  • get_software_using_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_statsno sensitive capability
  • get_stix_typeno sensitive capability
  • get_subtechniques_of_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_tactics_by_matrixno sensitive capability
  • get_tactics_by_techniqueno sensitive capability
  • get_technique_by_idno sensitive capability
  • get_technique_tacticsno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_by_platformno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_by_tacticno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_detected_by_datacomponentno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_mitigated_by_mitigationno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_targeting_assetno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_used_by_campaignno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_used_by_groupno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_used_by_group_softwareno sensitive capability
  • get_techniques_used_by_softwareno sensitive capability
  • search_groupsno sensitive capability
  • search_softwareno sensitive capability
  • search_techniquesno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.4 latest A 93/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/imouiche-mitre-attack-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/imouiche-mitre-attack-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/imouiche-mitre-attack-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/imouiche-mitre-attack-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/imouiche-mitre-attack-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @imouiche/mitre-attack-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Mitre Attack 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Security & Testing