Ihow Memory MCP Server

ihow-memory npm v0.1.0-alpha.25 Source verified

Published by ihow1 — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Trust grade
D
66/100
Last scanned
Trust
D · 66/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
D Why this grade threat 72 − adoption risk = 66/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 28.3 = 72. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−22 Hardcoded AWS access key id in server code MTC-SRC-008 exfiltration
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 72 − 6 = 66. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source
inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see

Grade capped: 1 confirmed high finding → grade capped at C. A hard gate overrides the point total — no amount of clean surface buys back a confirmed catastrophe.

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 8

high Hardcoded AWS access key id in server code (dist/benchmark.js)MTC-SRC-008

A live-looking AWS access key id is hardcoded in `dist/benchmark.js:152`. Secrets in source ship to everyone who installs the package and are a direct credential leak.

Evidence: AWS access key id: AKIA…(redacted)

Fix: Remove the secret, rotate it, and load credentials from the environment or a secret store.

Location: server dist/benchmark.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (bin/ihow-memory.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`bin/ihow-memory.mjs:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server bin/ihow-memory.mjs

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/anchors.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/anchors.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/anchors.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/benchmark.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/benchmark.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/benchmark.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/engine/retrieval.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/retrieval.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/retrieval.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/mcp/probe.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/mcp/probe.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child_process

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/mcp/probe.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/engine/fts.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/engine/fts.js:50`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: exec(`PRAGMA busy_timeout = ${

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/engine/fts.js

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.0-alpha.25 latest D 66/100 8 1.7.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: D · 66/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ihow-memory/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ihow-memory)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ihow-memory"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ihow-memory/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ihow-memory/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan ihow-memory --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools