@iflow-mcp/unity-mcp
npm
v1.0.0
Published by @iflow-mcp — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
A bridge between Unity and AI assistants using the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tools that read sensitive data ([get_logs]) and tools that can send data out ([execute_code]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.
Evidence: sources [get_logs] → sinks [execute_code]
Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.
Location: flow get_logs → execute_code
In the server's implementation (`dist/unity/MockUnityClient.js:273`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: return eval(code); } // For other code, return a mock object with a custom mess
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/unity/MockUnityClient.js
In the server's implementation (`src/unity/MockUnityClient.ts:320`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: code)) { return eval(code); } // For other code, return a mock object with a custom message r
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/unity/MockUnityClient.ts
Tool "execute_code" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "execute code" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool execute_code
In the server's implementation (`dist/unity/MockUnityClient.js:273`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: return eval(code); } // For other code, return a mock object with a custom mess
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/unity/MockUnityClient.js
In the server's implementation (`src/unity/MockUnityClient.ts:320`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: code)) { return eval(code); } // For other code, return a mock object with a custom message r
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/unity/MockUnityClient.ts
In the server's implementation (`dist/dev/runner.js:40`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ire("chokidar")); const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); const path = __importStar(require("path")); const ch
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/dev/runner.js
In the server's implementation (`src/dev/runner.ts:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: n, ChildProcess } from 'child_process'; import * as path from 'path'; import * as fs from 'fs'; import chalk from 'chalk
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/dev/runner.ts
In the server's implementation (`test-mcp-client.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: st { spawn } = require('child_process'); const path = require('path'); // Create a JSON-RPC 2.0 initialize request cons
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server test-mcp-client.js
Tool "execute_code" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool execute_code
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
execute_coderuns code / shellget_logsreads sensitive dataget_log_by_nameno sensitive capabilityget_stateno sensitive capabilityqueryno sensitive capabilitystart_gameno sensitive capabilitystop_gameno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.0 latest |
A 92/100 | 10 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @iflow-mcp/unity-mcp --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 9 side by side →
Simplified Unity Editor control via MCP - Execute ANY Unity API code with execute_csharp, manage scenes, automate testing, and monitor console. 8 essential tools with unlimited flexibility.
MCP Unity Server for executing Unity operations and request Editor information
MCP Unity Server for executing Unity operations and request Editor information
Model Context Protocol server for Unity.
Lightweight MCP server for Unity - project info, AI/ML discovery, agent skills, 110+ tools (no Unity Editor required)
Unity MCP Server - Simple HTTP-based Unity Editor integration for AI assistants
Uncensored AI tools (chat, image, RE/malware analysis, JS deobfuscation, multi-step research) for Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, Zed, and any MCP client.
儿童故事 MCP 服务 - 提供故事列表和搜索功能
Grade any bet against thousands of play-by-play game simulations: win probability, odds, edge.
World Cup MCP server for the 2026 men's football tournament — live scores, fixtures, standings, read-only prediction-market signals, and paste-ready match cards. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, Zed. Not affiliated with FIFA or Anthropic.
MCP server exposing a live Dwarf Fortress fort to an AI agent as curated, semantic tools
MCP Server for Arknights: Endfield (TypeScript / stdio + Streamable HTTP)