Idamesh MCP Server

idamesh PyPI v1.0.0

Published by jordanro2 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 3

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/idamesh/bootstrap/plugin_main.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/idamesh/bootstrap/plugin_main.py:311`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ession"] = True subprocess.Popen(argv, **popen_kwargs) # noqa: S603 — detached singleton def PLUGIN_ENTRY():

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/idamesh/bootstrap/plugin_main.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/idamesh/infrastructure/process/worker_pool.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/idamesh/infrastructure/process/worker_pool.py:373`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: : process = subprocess.Popen(argv, **popen_kwargs) # noqa: S603 except OSError as exc:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/idamesh/infrastructure/process/worker_pool.py

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (src/idamesh/infrastructure/ida/execute_sync.py)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`src/idamesh/infrastructure/ida/execute_sync.py:88`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: module = __import__(module_name) return bool(module.is_main_thread()) except

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/idamesh/infrastructure/ida/execute_sync.py

Tools 42

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • analyze_functioningests untrusted input
  • analyze_componentno sensitive capability
  • basic_blocksno sensitive capability
  • calleesno sensitive capability
  • callgraphno sensitive capability
  • decompileno sensitive capability
  • detect_stack_stringsno sensitive capability
  • detect_vulnsno sensitive capability
  • disasmno sensitive capability
  • entity_queryno sensitive capability
Show 32 more tools ↓
  • export_annotationsno sensitive capability
  • export_funcsno sensitive capability
  • find_bytesno sensitive capability
  • find_cryptono sensitive capability
  • find_dangerous_callersno sensitive capability
  • find_regexno sensitive capability
  • func_profileno sensitive capability
  • func_queryno sensitive capability
  • get_bytesno sensitive capability
  • get_global_valueno sensitive capability
  • get_intno sensitive capability
  • get_metadatano sensitive capability
  • get_stringno sensitive capability
  • importsno sensitive capability
  • imports_queryno sensitive capability
  • insn_queryno sensitive capability
  • int_convertno sensitive capability
  • list_funcsno sensitive capability
  • list_globalsno sensitive capability
  • list_stringsno sensitive capability
  • lookup_funcsno sensitive capability
  • read_structno sensitive capability
  • search_structsno sensitive capability
  • search_textno sensitive capability
  • server_healthno sensitive capability
  • survey_binaryno sensitive capability
  • trace_data_flowno sensitive capability
  • trace_source_to_sinkno sensitive capability
  • type_inspectno sensitive capability
  • type_queryno sensitive capability
  • xref_queryno sensitive capability
  • xrefs_tono sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.0 latest A 93/100 3 1.9.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/idamesh/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/idamesh)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/idamesh"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/idamesh/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/idamesh/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan idamesh --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools