Twitter MCP Servers: 10 Implementations Compared

The MCP ecosystem often has several independent packages implementing the same tool — and "Twitter" currently has 10. Every one of them was scanned with the same deterministic engine, so the numbers below are directly comparable: the Trust Score (A–F), the capability blast radius, and how much of the package the scan could actually inspect. They are ranked by score; ties break toward unscoped, longer-established packages.

ImplementationPackageTrustCapabilityCoverageFindingsScanned
Twitterbest by enescinar @enescinar/twitter-mcp npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Twitter by iflow-mcp @iflow-mcp/mcp-twitter-server npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Twitter by crazyrabbitLTC mcp-twitter-server npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Twitter by iflow-mcp @iflow-mcp/twitter-mcp npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Twitter by Vivek7038 twitter-mcp npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Twitter by taazkareem twitter-mcp-server npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Twitter by isteam @isteam/twitter-mcp npm A 100/100 Minimal Source 0 2026-07-22
Mcp Twitter by npm mcp_twitter npm A 98/100 Minimal Source 1 2026-07-22
Twitter by PyPI twitter-mcp PyPI A 98/100 Minimal Source 1 2026-07-22
Twitter by muhammadsiddiq @muhammadsiddiq/twitter-mcp npm A 94/100 Minimal Source 1 2026-07-22

A higher-ranked implementation is not "the official one" — ranking reflects only what the deterministic scan found in each published package. Open an implementation to read its individual findings with evidence, its scan history per version, and to grab an embeddable badge. Scores are automated opinions, recomputed on every rescan.