Google Automation MCP Server

google-automation-mcp PyPI v0.7.1

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Headless Google Workspace automation for AI - Apps Script, Gmail, Drive, Sheets, Calendar, Docs, Tasks, Forms

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Tool "run_script_function_tool" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "run_script_function_tool" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "run_script" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool run_script_function_tool

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/google_automation_mcp/auth/clasp.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/google_automation_mcp/auth/clasp.py:48`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["npx", "@google/clasp", "--version"], capture_output=Tr

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/google_automation_mcp/auth/clasp.py

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (src/google_automation_mcp/router/script_template.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`src/google_automation_mcp/router/script_template.js:10`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: nt. try { UrlFetchApp.fetch('https://www.googleapis.com/tasks/v1/users/@me/lists?maxResults=1', { headers: {'Autho

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/google_automation_mcp/router/script_template.js

low Mutating tool "run_script_function_tool" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "run_script_function_tool" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool run_script_function_tool

Tools 60

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • run_script_function_toolruns code / shell
  • add_form_question_toolno sensitive capability
  • append_doc_text_toolno sensitive capability
  • append_sheet_values_toolno sensitive capability
  • complete_google_auth_toolno sensitive capability
  • complete_task_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_deployment_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_doc_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_drive_file_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_drive_folder_toolno sensitive capability
Show 50 more tools ↓
  • create_event_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_form_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_script_project_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_spreadsheet_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_task_toolno sensitive capability
  • create_version_toolno sensitive capability
  • delete_deployment_toolno sensitive capability
  • delete_drive_file_toolno sensitive capability
  • delete_event_toolno sensitive capability
  • delete_script_project_toolno sensitive capability
  • delete_task_toolno sensitive capability
  • generate_trigger_codeno sensitive capability
  • get_doc_content_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_drive_file_content_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_events_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_form_responses_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_form_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_gmail_message_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_script_content_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_script_metrics_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_script_project_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_sheet_values_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_spreadsheet_metadata_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_tasks_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_version_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_calendars_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_deployments_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_drive_items_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_drive_permissions_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_gmail_labels_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_script_processes_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_script_projects_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_spreadsheets_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_task_lists_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_versions_toolno sensitive capability
  • modify_doc_text_toolno sensitive capability
  • modify_gmail_labels_toolno sensitive capability
  • remove_drive_permission_toolno sensitive capability
  • search_docs_toolno sensitive capability
  • search_drive_files_toolno sensitive capability
  • search_gmail_messages_toolno sensitive capability
  • send_gmail_message_toolno sensitive capability
  • share_drive_file_toolno sensitive capability
  • start_google_auth_toolno sensitive capability
  • trash_drive_file_toolno sensitive capability
  • update_deployment_toolno sensitive capability
  • update_event_toolno sensitive capability
  • update_script_content_toolno sensitive capability
  • update_sheet_values_toolno sensitive capability
  • update_task_toolno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.7.1 latest A 92/100 4 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-automation-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-automation-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-automation-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-automation-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-automation-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan google-automation-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools