git-mcp-server
PyPI
v0.2.5
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
Git MCP Server - Unified command-line tool for managing Git repositories across GitHub and GitLab
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`git_mcp/commands/mr.py:28`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: usage result = subprocess.run( # nosec B603, B607 - Safe git command with fixed args ["git", "bran
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server git_mcp/commands/mr.py
In the server's implementation (`git_mcp/mcp_server.py:846`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: xists, then add subprocess.run( ["claude", "mcp", "remove", "git-mcp-server"], capture_o
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server git_mcp/mcp_server.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
create_issuenetwork egresscreate_issue_commentnetwork egressclose_issueno sensitive capabilityclose_merge_requestno sensitive capabilityclose_milestoneno sensitive capabilitycreate_forkno sensitive capabilitycreate_merge_requestno sensitive capabilitycreate_milestoneno sensitive capabilitycreate_projectno sensitive capabilitydelete_projectno sensitive capabilityget_current_user_infono sensitive capabilityget_fork_infono sensitive capabilityget_issue_by_urlno sensitive capabilityget_issue_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_merge_request_commitsno sensitive capabilityget_merge_request_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_merge_request_diffno sensitive capabilityget_platform_configno sensitive capabilityget_project_detailsno sensitive capabilitylist_all_issuesno sensitive capabilitylist_forksno sensitive capabilitylist_issuesno sensitive capabilitylist_merge_requestsno sensitive capabilitylist_milestonesno sensitive capabilitylist_my_issuesno sensitive capabilitylist_my_merge_requestsno sensitive capabilitylist_platformsno sensitive capabilitylist_projectsno sensitive capabilityrefresh_platform_usernameno sensitive capabilitytest_platform_connectionno sensitive capabilityupdate_issueno sensitive capabilityupdate_merge_requestno sensitive capabilityupdate_milestoneno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.2.5 latest |
A 92/100 | 2 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan git-mcp-server --online --registry pypi
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 17 side by side →
MCP server for GitLab and GitHub
The official Git server: read, search and analyse local repositories — status, diff, log and more.
MCP server for Git — structured status, log, diff, and branch data for AI agents
A Git MCP server that doesn't suck
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server enabling LLMs and AI agents to interact with Git repositories. Provides tools for comprehensive Git operations including clone, commit, branch, diff, log, status, push, pull, merge, rebase, worktree, tag management,
MCP server for Git operations
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates AgentQL data extraction capabilities.
Screenshot any URL or HTML as PNG/JPEG/WebP from your AI agent. Full-page, clean, no install.
MCP server for aria51 accessibility scanner
Bridge any browser web app to Claude Code via MCP
Browserbase’s official MCP server: cloud headless browsers for agents, with sessions and screenshots.
MCP server for AI web browser automation using Browserbase and Stagehand