Garuhq MCP Server

@garuhq/mcp npm v0.23.0 Source verified

Published by garu-pagamentos — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Garu MCP server — payments for AI agents. PIX, card, boleto.

Trust grade
A
97/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 97/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 97/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 3 = 97. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_webhook_event]) co-exist with external-action tools ([mark_plan_installment_paid, retry_webhook_event, resend_webhook_event]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_webhook_event] → sinks [mark_plan_installment_paid, retry_webhook_event, resend_webhook_event]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_webhook_event → mark_plan_installment_paid

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_webhook_eventingests untrusted input
  • mark_plan_installment_paidnetwork egress
  • resend_webhook_eventnetwork egress
  • retry_webhook_eventnetwork egress
  • cancel_chargeno sensitive capability
  • cancel_installment_planno sensitive capability
  • cancel_recurrence_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • change_scheduled_charge_payment_methodno sensitive capability
  • charge_now_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • clear_product_portal_configno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • clear_scheduled_charge_payment_methodno sensitive capability
  • confirm_refund_requestno sensitive capability
  • create_boleto_chargeno sensitive capability
  • create_customerno sensitive capability
  • create_installment_planno sensitive capability
  • create_pix_chargeno sensitive capability
  • create_productno sensitive capability
  • create_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • delete_customerno sensitive capability
  • get_chargeno sensitive capability
  • get_customerno sensitive capability
  • get_installment_planno sensitive capability
  • get_integration_setupno sensitive capability
  • get_productno sensitive capability
  • get_product_portal_configno sensitive capability
  • get_refund_requestno sensitive capability
  • get_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • list_chargesno sensitive capability
  • list_customersno sensitive capability
  • list_installment_plansno sensitive capability
  • list_productsno sensitive capability
  • list_refund_requestsno sensitive capability
  • list_scheduled_charge_attemptsno sensitive capability
  • list_scheduled_chargesno sensitive capability
  • list_webhook_eventsno sensitive capability
  • mark_paid_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • pause_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • postpone_plan_installmentno sensitive capability
  • postpone_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • refund_chargeno sensitive capability
  • reissue_plan_installmentno sensitive capability
  • reject_refund_requestno sensitive capability
  • request_plan_refundno sensitive capability
  • resume_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • set_cancel_at_period_end_scheduled_chargeno sensitive capability
  • set_customer_billing_email_overrideno sensitive capability
  • set_product_portal_configno sensitive capability
  • update_customerno sensitive capability
  • update_productno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 4

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.23.0 latest A 97/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-08
v0.19.0 A 97/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-22
v0.17.0 A 97/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-15
v0.16.0 A 97/100 1 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 97/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/garuhq-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/garuhq-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/garuhq-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/garuhq-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/garuhq-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @garuhq/mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Finance & Commerce