Selenium (gaforov) MCP Server

@gaforov/selenium-mcp npm v0.2.1

Published by @gaforov — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Selenium-based automation with 39 tools covering navigation, clicks, typing, assertions, screenshots, multi-session use, and page snapshots with stable element references and batched execution.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Tool "execute_script" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "execute_script" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (parameter "script"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool execute_script

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_page_source]) co-exist with external-action tools ([execute_script, upload_file]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_page_source] → sinks [execute_script, upload_file]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_page_source → execute_script

medium Unconstrained command parameter "script" on "execute_script"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "execute_script" takes a command-shaped parameter "script" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool execute_script · inputSchema.properties.script

low Mutating tool "execute_script" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "execute_script" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool execute_script

Tools 39

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • execute_scriptruns code / shell
  • get_page_sourceingests untrusted input
  • upload_filenetwork egress
  • add_cookieno sensitive capability
  • alertno sensitive capability
  • assert_attributeno sensitive capability
  • assert_textno sensitive capability
  • assert_visibleno sensitive capability
  • batch_executeno sensitive capability
  • capture_pageno sensitive capability
Show 29 more tools ↓
  • clickno sensitive capability
  • delete_cookieno sensitive capability
  • find_elementno sensitive capability
  • frameno sensitive capability
  • get_attributeno sensitive capability
  • get_cookiesno sensitive capability
  • get_current_urlno sensitive capability
  • get_textno sensitive capability
  • get_titleno sensitive capability
  • interactno sensitive capability
  • navigateno sensitive capability
  • open_urlno sensitive capability
  • press_keyno sensitive capability
  • retry_clickno sensitive capability
  • selector_hint_deleteno sensitive capability
  • selector_hint_getno sensitive capability
  • selector_hint_listno sensitive capability
  • selector_hint_saveno sensitive capability
  • session_createno sensitive capability
  • session_destroyno sensitive capability
  • session_listno sensitive capability
  • session_selectno sensitive capability
  • start_browserno sensitive capability
  • stop_browserno sensitive capability
  • take_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • typeno sensitive capability
  • wait_for_elementno sensitive capability
  • wait_until_visibleno sensitive capability
  • windowno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.1 latest A 93/100 4 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/gaforov-selenium-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/gaforov-selenium-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/gaforov-selenium-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/gaforov-selenium-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/gaforov-selenium-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @gaforov/selenium-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Selenium 14

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 15 side by side →

More in Browser Automation