fro-wang-academic-tools-mcp
PyPI
v0.1.4
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
download_paperingests untrusted inputbatch_process_papersno sensitive capabilitycancel_process_paper_jobno sensitive capabilityextract_metadatano sensitive capabilityextract_sectionsno sensitive capabilitygenerate_summaryno sensitive capabilityget_batch_statusno sensitive capabilityget_process_paper_jobno sensitive capabilitylist_jobsno sensitive capabilityocr_paperno sensitive capabilityprocess_paperno sensitive capabilityrename_paper_folderno sensitive capabilityretry_jobno sensitive capabilitysearch_papersno sensitive capabilitystart_process_paper_jobno sensitive capabilitytranslate_paperno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_annotationsno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_collection_itemsno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_collectionsno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_item_fulltextno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_item_metadatano sensitive capabilityzotero_get_notesno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_recentno sensitive capabilityzotero_get_tagsno sensitive capabilityzotero_search_itemsno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.4 latest |
A 95/100 | 0 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan fro-wang-academic-tools-mcp --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the Agentmail MCP server.
Security scan results for the Alfahq MCP server.
Security scan results for the Alpine MCP server.
Search the official Astro framework documentation.
Security scan results for the Atag MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aurais Mcp Research Reader MCP server.