Flowengine N8n Workflow Builder MCP Server

flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder npm v4.4.4

Published by ami3466 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Build n8n workflows from text using AI. Connect to Claude, Cursor, or any LLM to generate and validate n8n workflows with expert knowledge and intelligent auto-fixing. Built by FlowEngine. Now with real node parameter schemas from n8n packages!

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 8

high Dynamic code execution in server code (dist/lib/security.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/security.js:49`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: message: 'Use of eval() detected - potential code injection', node: node.name,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lib/security.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/lib/security.ts)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/lib/security.ts:66`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: message: 'Use of eval() detected - potential code injection', node: node.name, recommendation

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/lib/security.ts

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/lib/security.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/security.js:63`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ing' && (code.includes('child_process') || code.includes('exec'))) { issues.push({ s

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lib/security.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/lib/security.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/lib/security.ts:82`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ing' && (code.includes('child_process') || code.includes('exec'))) { issues.push({ severity: 'critical

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/lib/security.ts

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (dist/lib/node-descriptions.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/node-descriptions.js:50`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: onst nodeModule = await import(nodeModulePath); // Get the node class - find the class constructor export

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lib/node-descriptions.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (dist/lib/node-loader.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`dist/lib/node-loader.js:51`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: onst nodeModule = await import(nodeModulePath); // Get the default export (the node class) const NodeCla

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lib/node-loader.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (src/lib/node-descriptions.ts)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`src/lib/node-descriptions.ts:63`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: onst nodeModule = await import(nodeModulePath); // Get the node class - find the class constructor export let N

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/lib/node-descriptions.ts

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (src/lib/node-loader.ts)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`src/lib/node-loader.ts:87`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: onst nodeModule = await import(nodeModulePath); // Get the default export (the node class) const NodeClass = no

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/lib/node-loader.ts

Tools 28

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • Workflow Templates Libraryingests untrusted input
  • add_connectionno sensitive capability
  • add_nodeno sensitive capability
  • AI Agent Workflow Exampleno sensitive capability
  • analyze_performanceno sensitive capability
  • analyze_workflowno sensitive capability
  • build_workflowno sensitive capability
  • delete_nodeno sensitive capability
  • edit_nodeno sensitive capability
  • Email to Slack Workflow Exampleno sensitive capability
Show 18 more tools ↓
  • explain_workflowno sensitive capability
  • extract_workflow_jsonno sensitive capability
  • fix_jsonno sensitive capability
  • get_node_detailsno sensitive capability
  • get_templateno sensitive capability
  • get_workflow_detailsno sensitive capability
  • list_nodes_by_categoryno sensitive capability
  • list_templatesno sensitive capability
  • n8n-workflow-expertno sensitive capability
  • scan_securityno sensitive capability
  • search_nodesno sensitive capability
  • search_templatesno sensitive capability
  • suggest_architectureno sensitive capability
  • suggest_improvementsno sensitive capability
  • suggest_nodesno sensitive capability
  • taskno sensitive capability
  • test_workflowno sensitive capability
  • validate_workflowno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v4.4.4 latest A 93/100 8 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan flowengine-n8n-workflow-builder --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Productivity & Workflow