Ghost (fanyangmeng) MCP Server
@fanyangmeng/ghost-mcp
npm
v0.2.0
Published by @fanyangmeng — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
MCP server for using the Ghost API
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 42
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
invites_browseingests untrusted inputmembers_browseingests untrusted inputnewsletters_browseingests untrusted inputoffers_browseingests untrusted inputposts_browseingests untrusted inputroles_browseingests untrusted inputtags_browseingests untrusted inputtiers_browseingests untrusted inputusers_browseingests untrusted inputinvites_addno sensitive capability
Show 32 more tools ↓
invites_deleteno sensitive capabilitymembers_addno sensitive capabilitymembers_deleteno sensitive capabilitymembers_editno sensitive capabilitymembers_readno sensitive capabilitynewsletters_addno sensitive capabilitynewsletters_deleteno sensitive capabilitynewsletters_editno sensitive capabilitynewsletters_readno sensitive capabilityoffers_addno sensitive capabilityoffers_deleteno sensitive capabilityoffers_editno sensitive capabilityoffers_readno sensitive capabilityposts_addno sensitive capabilityposts_deleteno sensitive capabilityposts_editno sensitive capabilityposts_readno sensitive capabilityroles_readno sensitive capabilitytags_addno sensitive capabilitytags_deleteno sensitive capabilitytags_editno sensitive capabilitytags_readno sensitive capabilitytiers_addno sensitive capabilitytiers_deleteno sensitive capabilitytiers_editno sensitive capabilitytiers_readno sensitive capabilityusers_deleteno sensitive capabilityusers_editno sensitive capabilityusers_readno sensitive capabilitywebhooks_addno sensitive capabilitywebhooks_deleteno sensitive capabilitywebhooks_editno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (42 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.2.0 latest |
A 95/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-06 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @fanyangmeng/ghost-mcp --onlineOther implementations of Ghost 9
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 10 side by side →
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for Ghost CMS - enables AI assistants to interact with Ghost blogs
Model Context Protocol server for Ghost CMS - manage your blog content with AI
Ghost MCP Server for interacting with Ghost CMS API
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for interacting with Ghost CMS via the Admin API
MCP server for Ghost CMS — manage content, members, newsletters, and more via LLMs
MCP server for using the Ghost API
More in Content Management
Apify MCP Server
Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for the *@inkeep/agents-mcp* API.
Medicare spending, chronic conditions, hospital quality, readmissions, and enrollment
Public read-only MCP for products, frameworks, guides, methodology, and blog metadata.
Community-maintained MCP server for Atlassian Confluence Data Center. Not affiliated with Atlassian.
MCP server for Contentful Content Management API integration