Evernote (king) MCP Server
evernote-mcp
PyPI
v0.4.1
Published by king — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Evernote operations
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 1 = 99. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 52
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
clear_reminderno sensitive capabilitycomplete_reminderno sensitive capabilitycopy_noteno sensitive capabilitycreate_noteno sensitive capabilitycreate_notebookno sensitive capabilitycreate_searchno sensitive capabilitycreate_tagno sensitive capabilitydelete_noteno sensitive capabilitydelete_notebookno sensitive capabilityexpunge_noteno sensitive capability
Show 42 more tools ↓
expunge_searchno sensitive capabilityexpunge_tagno sensitive capabilityfind_note_countsno sensitive capabilityfind_relatedno sensitive capabilityget_default_notebookno sensitive capabilityget_noteno sensitive capabilityget_note_contentno sensitive capabilityget_note_search_textno sensitive capabilityget_note_tag_namesno sensitive capabilityget_note_versionno sensitive capabilityget_notebookno sensitive capabilityget_reminderno sensitive capabilityget_resourceno sensitive capabilityget_resource_alternate_datano sensitive capabilityget_resource_application_datano sensitive capabilityget_resource_application_data_entryno sensitive capabilityget_resource_attributesno sensitive capabilityget_resource_by_hashno sensitive capabilityget_resource_datano sensitive capabilityget_resource_recognitionno sensitive capabilityget_resource_search_textno sensitive capabilityget_searchno sensitive capabilityget_sync_stateno sensitive capabilityget_tagno sensitive capabilitylist_note_versionsno sensitive capabilitylist_notebooksno sensitive capabilitylist_notesno sensitive capabilitylist_remindersno sensitive capabilitylist_searchesno sensitive capabilitylist_tagsno sensitive capabilitylist_tags_by_notebookno sensitive capabilitymove_noteno sensitive capabilitysearch_notesno sensitive capabilityset_reminderno sensitive capabilityset_resource_application_data_entryno sensitive capabilityunset_resource_application_data_entryno sensitive capabilityuntag_allno sensitive capabilityupdate_noteno sensitive capabilityupdate_notebookno sensitive capabilityupdate_resourceno sensitive capabilityupdate_searchno sensitive capabilityupdate_tagno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (52 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 2
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.4.1 latest |
A 99/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
v0.3.5 |
A 99/100 | 0 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-27 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan evernote-mcp --online --registry pypiOther implementations of Evernote 2
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →
MCP server for Evernote integration with note management and synchronization
MCP Server for [Evernote](https://evernote.com) (unofficial)
More in Developer Tools
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.