Encrata MCP Server

encrata-mcp npm v4.2.0

Published by encratahq — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Encrata MCP Server — Email intelligence, phone, company, domain, IP, Google & dark web search, web scraping, face recognition, monitoring, and contact lists for AI agents.

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_bulk_job, download_email_job]) co-exist with external-action tools ([create_webhook, update_webhook, delete_webhook, test_webhook, webhook_deliveries]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_bulk_job, download_email_job] → sinks [create_webhook, update_webhook, delete_webhook, test_webhook, webhook_deliveries]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_bulk_job → create_webhook

Tools 51

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • create_webhooknetwork egress
  • delete_webhooknetwork egress
  • download_email_jobingests untrusted input
  • get_bulk_jobingests untrusted input
  • test_webhooknetwork egress
  • update_webhooknetwork egress
  • webhook_deliveriesnetwork egress
  • add_emails_to_listno sensitive capability
  • bulk_email_identityno sensitive capability
  • bulk_password_breachesno sensitive capability
Show 41 more tools ↓
  • bulk_validate_emailsno sensitive capability
  • cancel_bulk_jobno sensitive capability
  • cancel_email_jobno sensitive capability
  • check_breachesno sensitive capability
  • check_creditsno sensitive capability
  • create_api_keyno sensitive capability
  • create_contact_listno sensitive capability
  • create_monitorno sensitive capability
  • create_workspaceno sensitive capability
  • credit_transactionsno sensitive capability
  • delete_contact_listno sensitive capability
  • delete_workspaceno sensitive capability
  • get_contact_listno sensitive capability
  • get_email_job_resultsno sensitive capability
  • get_email_job_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_monitorno sensitive capability
  • get_run_resultsno sensitive capability
  • invite_workspace_memberno sensitive capability
  • list_api_keysno sensitive capability
  • list_bulk_jobsno sensitive capability
  • list_contact_list_emailsno sensitive capability
  • list_contact_listsno sensitive capability
  • list_monitorsno sensitive capability
  • list_runsno sensitive capability
  • list_webhooksno sensitive capability
  • list_workspace_membersno sensitive capability
  • list_workspacesno sensitive capability
  • lookup_emailno sensitive capability
  • remove_emails_from_listno sensitive capability
  • remove_workspace_memberno sensitive capability
  • rename_api_keyno sensitive capability
  • retry_email_jobno sensitive capability
  • revoke_api_keyno sensitive capability
  • set_api_key_limitno sensitive capability
  • set_api_key_statusno sensitive capability
  • set_workspace_member_roleno sensitive capability
  • switch_workspaceno sensitive capability
  • trigger_monitor_runno sensitive capability
  • update_workspaceno sensitive capability
  • validate_emailno sensitive capability
  • whoamino sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v4.2.0 latest A 96/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-09
v4.1.0 A 96/100 0 1.12.1 2026-07-29
v3.1.0 A 96/100 0 1.12.1 2026-07-28

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/encrata-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/encrata-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/encrata-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/encrata-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/encrata-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan encrata-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools