Cura MCP Server

cura-mcp PyPI v0.5.0

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Trust grade
A
95/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 95/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 95/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • open_projectnetwork egress
  • save_projectnetwork egress
  • arrange_allno sensitive capability
  • center_modelno sensitive capability
  • clear_plateno sensitive capability
  • duplicate_modelno sensitive capability
  • export_gcodeno sensitive capability
  • export_modelno sensitive capability
  • get_all_user_settingsno sensitive capability
  • get_estimatesno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • get_machine_infono sensitive capability
  • get_model_settingsno sensitive capability
  • get_qualityno sensitive capability
  • get_settingno sensitive capability
  • get_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • get_statusno sensitive capability
  • group_modelsno sensitive capability
  • lay_flatno sensitive capability
  • list_machinesno sensitive capability
  • list_materialsno sensitive capability
  • list_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_quality_profilesno sensitive capability
  • list_variantsno sensitive capability
  • load_modelno sensitive capability
  • merge_modelsno sensitive capability
  • mirror_modelno sensitive capability
  • move_modelno sensitive capability
  • remove_modelno sensitive capability
  • reset_all_settingsno sensitive capability
  • reset_model_settingno sensitive capability
  • reset_orientationno sensitive capability
  • reset_settingno sensitive capability
  • rotateno sensitive capability
  • scale_modelno sensitive capability
  • scale_to_fitno sensitive capability
  • select_modelno sensitive capability
  • set_adhesionno sensitive capability
  • set_infill_densityno sensitive capability
  • set_layer_heightno sensitive capability
  • set_mesh_typeno sensitive capability
  • set_model_settingno sensitive capability
  • set_qualityno sensitive capability
  • set_settingno sensitive capability
  • set_supportsno sensitive capability
  • sliceno sensitive capability
  • switch_machineno sensitive capability
  • switch_materialno sensitive capability
  • switch_variantno sensitive capability
  • ungroup_modelno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.5.0 latest A 95/100 0 1.9.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 95/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cura-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cura-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cura-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cura-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cura-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan cura-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools