Jira (cuongph.dev) MCP Server

@cuongph.dev/jira-mcp npm v0.1.15

Published by @cuongph.dev — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for internal Jira 8 via SSO session bootstrap with Playwright

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([jira_get_issue, jira_get_audit_context]) co-exist with external-action tools ([jira_create_issue, jira_preview_create_issue, jira_preview_adf, jira_sync_gitlab_review_defects]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [jira_get_issue, jira_get_audit_context] → sinks [jira_create_issue, jira_preview_create_issue, jira_preview_adf, jira_sync_gitlab_review_defects]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow jira_get_issue → jira_create_issue

Tools 47

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • jira_create_issuenetwork egress
  • jira_get_audit_contextingests untrusted input
  • jira_get_issueingests untrusted input
  • jira_preview_adfnetwork egress
  • jira_preview_create_issuenetwork egress
  • jira_sync_gitlab_review_defectsnetwork egress
  • jira_act_on_timesheet_approvalno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_comment_with_fileno sensitive capability
Show 37 more tools ↓
  • jira_add_commentsno sensitive capability
  • jira_add_worklogno sensitive capability
  • jira_assign_issueno sensitive capability
  • jira_bulk_link_issuesno sensitive capability
  • jira_bulk_transition_issuesno sensitive capability
  • jira_bulk_update_issue_fieldsno sensitive capability
  • jira_clone_issueno sensitive capability
  • jira_create_subtaskno sensitive capability
  • jira_delete_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_delete_issueno sensitive capability
  • jira_delete_worklogno sensitive capability
  • jira_export_project_timesheetno sensitive capability
  • jira_find_userno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_commentsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_componentsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_create_metano sensitive capability
  • jira_get_edit_metano sensitive capability
  • jira_get_issue_contextno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_issue_linksno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_my_worklogsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_prioritiesno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_projectsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_subtasksno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_timesheet_approval_logno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_timesheet_approvalsno sensitive capability
  • jira_get_transitionsno sensitive capability
  • jira_link_issuesno sensitive capability
  • jira_search_issuesno sensitive capability
  • jira_search_tempo_teamsno sensitive capability
  • jira_search_worklogsno sensitive capability
  • jira_smart_searchno sensitive capability
  • jira_transition_issueno sensitive capability
  • jira_update_commentno sensitive capability
  • jira_update_issue_fieldsno sensitive capability
  • jira_update_worklogno sensitive capability
  • jira_upload_attachment_contentno sensitive capability
  • jira_validate_issue_updateno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.15 latest A 96/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v0.1.14 A 96/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-13

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cuongph-dev-jira-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cuongph-dev-jira-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cuongph-dev-jira-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cuongph-dev-jira-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cuongph-dev-jira-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @cuongph.dev/jira-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Jira 44

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 45 side by side →

More in Productivity & Workflow