Sftp MCP Server

@cordfuse/sftp-mcp npm v0.1.0

Published by @cordfuse — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

SFTP as a browsable filesystem for AI agents (MCP): list, stat, move, mkdir, delete, batch, upload, download — not just upload/download. Node, stdio + streamable HTTP.

Trust grade
A
91/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 91/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 99 − adoption risk = 91/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 1.2 = 99. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−1.2 Shell command embedded in tool metadata MTC-INJ-CMD-1 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 99 − 8 = 91. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 7

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: download_file → list_files → upload_file. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow download_file → list_files → upload_file

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (dist/sftp.js)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`dist/sftp.js:8`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const DEFAULT_KEYS = ["id_ed25519", "id_ecdsa", "id_rsa"]; /** * Resolve authentication for a connection. Priority: in

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/sftp.js

medium Tool "delete_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "delete_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "delete_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool delete_file

low Mutating tool "delete_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "delete_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool delete_file

low Shell command embedded in tool metadataMTC-INJ-CMD-1

Shell command embedded in tool metadata detected in the description of tool "delete_dir". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.

Evidence: rm -rf

Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.

Location: tool delete_dir · description

low Unconstrained path parameter "path" on "list_files"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "list_files" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool list_files · inputSchema.properties.path

low Unconstrained path parameter "path" on "delete_file"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "delete_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool delete_file · inputSchema.properties.path

Tools 17

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • delete_filewrites files
  • download_fileingests untrusted input
  • download_filesingests untrusted input
  • list_filesreads sensitive data
  • upload_filenetwork egress
  • chmodno sensitive capability
  • delete_dirno sensitive capability
  • disk_usageno sensitive capability
  • lstatno sensitive capability
  • make_directoryno sensitive capability
Show 7 more tools ↓
  • moveno sensitive capability
  • read_symlinkno sensitive capability
  • realpathno sensitive capability
  • statno sensitive capability
  • symlinkno sensitive capability
  • test_connectionno sensitive capability
  • upload_dirno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.0 latest A 91/100 7 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 91/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cordfuse-sftp-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cordfuse-sftp-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cordfuse-sftp-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cordfuse-sftp-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cordfuse-sftp-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @cordfuse/sftp-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools