Sdk (commoncompute) MCP Server

@commoncompute/sdk npm v0.2.0

Published by @commoncompute — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chunk-E56TUHYC.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-E56TUHYC.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import { promises as fs } from "fs"; import { homedir, hostname } from "os"; imp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chunk-E56TUHYC.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli.cjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.cjs:449`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: child = (0, import_node_child_process.spawn)(opener, [url], { detached: true, stdio: "ignore" }); child.on("error",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli.cjs

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:1186`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; var playground = { name: "playground", category: "misc", summary: "Open th

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/mcp/server.cjs)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/mcp/server.cjs:31`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: auth.ts var import_node_child_process = require("child_process"); var import_node_fs = require("fs"); var import_node_os

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/mcp/server.cjs

Tools 71

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • cc_get_jobingests untrusted input
  • cc_get_job_eventsingests untrusted input
  • cc_get_modelingests untrusted input
  • cc_get_workloadingests untrusted input
  • cc_list_keysreads sensitive data
  • scopeingests untrusted input
  • api-keyno sensitive capability
  • array-sizeno sensitive capability
  • cc_cancel_jobno sensitive capability
  • cc_chatno sensitive capability
Show 61 more tools ↓
  • cc_create_keyno sensitive capability
  • cc_embedno sensitive capability
  • cc_generate_imageno sensitive capability
  • cc_get_balanceno sensitive capability
  • cc_get_billing_historyno sensitive capability
  • cc_get_job_result_urlno sensitive capability
  • cc_get_usageno sensitive capability
  • cc_list_modelsno sensitive capability
  • cc_list_workloadsno sensitive capability
  • cc_preview_job_resultno sensitive capability
  • cc_quote_jobno sensitive capability
  • cc_revoke_keyno sensitive capability
  • cc_submit_jobno sensitive capability
  • cc_transcribe_audiono sensitive capability
  • cc_wait_for_jobno sensitive capability
  • cc_whoamino sensitive capability
  • commandno sensitive capability
  • endno sensitive capability
  • formatno sensitive capability
  • granularityno sensitive capability
  • group-byno sensitive capability
  • idno sensitive capability
  • idempotency-keyno sensitive capability
  • Job eventsno sensitive capability
  • Job snapshotno sensitive capability
  • job-definitionno sensitive capability
  • job-nameno sensitive capability
  • jobsno sensitive capability
  • jsonno sensitive capability
  • limitno sensitive capability
  • loginno sensitive capability
  • maxno sensitive capability
  • max-spend-usdno sensitive capability
  • modeno sensitive capability
  • modelno sensitive capability
  • Model catalogno sensitive capability
  • Model specno sensitive capability
  • nameno sensitive capability
  • no-browserno sensitive capability
  • no-jsonno sensitive capability
  • no-streamno sensitive capability
  • outno sensitive capability
  • pasteno sensitive capability
  • payloadno sensitive capability
  • portno sensitive capability
  • priorityno sensitive capability
  • promptno sensitive capability
  • quietno sensitive capability
  • reasonno sensitive capability
  • startno sensitive capability
  • stateno sensitive capability
  • statusno sensitive capability
  • textno sensitive capability
  • timeoutno sensitive capability
  • transportno sensitive capability
  • typeno sensitive capability
  • unitsno sensitive capability
  • waitno sensitive capability
  • workloadno sensitive capability
  • Workload catalogno sensitive capability
  • Workload specno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.0 latest A 93/100 4 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/commoncompute-sdk/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/commoncompute-sdk)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/commoncompute-sdk"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/commoncompute-sdk/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/commoncompute-sdk/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @commoncompute/sdk --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Sdk 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Developer Tools