coder-mcp
PyPI
v1.0.1
Published by coder-mcp — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
High‑performance Managed Code Processor (MCP) server with AI‑powered code analysis and editing.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 9.5 = 91. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −9.5 | Unsafe deserialization ×2 MTC-SRC-007 | permissions |
2. Client adoption risk — 91 − 7 = 84. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/analysis/visitors/python_visitor.py:227`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: "Usage of eval() function detected", "Avoid eval() - use safer alternatives like ast.l
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/analysis/visitors/python_visitor.py
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/analysis/dependency_analyzer.py:630`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: on"] proc = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30) if proc.returncode
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/analysis/dependency_analyzer.py
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/analysis/detectors/security/injection.py:87`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ized commands, " "avoid shell=True" ), ) def _create_path_traversal_pattern(self) -> Vulnerabil
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/analysis/detectors/security/injection.py
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/analysis/metrics/coverage_reader.py:110`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ty result = subprocess.run( # nosec B603 [pytest_path, "--cov=coder_mcp", "--cov-report=jso
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/analysis/metrics/coverage_reader.py
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/analysis/visitors/python_visitor.py:240`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: "Usage of exec() function detected", "Avoid exec() - use safer alternatives",
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/analysis/visitors/python_visitor.py
Tool "edit_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "edit_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool edit_file
Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool write_file
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/core/providers/registry.py:244`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ry: __import__(requirement) except ImportError: self._add_missin
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/core/providers/registry.py
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/context/search/cache.py:96`): Deserializing untrusted data with these APIs can execute arbitrary code (a well-known RCE gadget class). This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: cached_result = pickle.loads(cached_data) # nosec B301 if isinstance(cached_result, list) a
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/context/search/cache.py
In the server's implementation (`coder_mcp/search/cache.py:33`): Deserializing untrusted data with these APIs can execute arbitrary code (a well-known RCE gadget class). This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: mbedding: List[float] = pickle.loads(cached) # nosec B301 self.embedding_cache.set(cache_key, embedding)
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server coder_mcp/search/cache.py
Tool "edit_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool edit_file
Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool write_file
Tool "read_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.
Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.
Location: tool read_file · inputSchema.properties.path
Tool "write_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.
Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.
Location: tool write_file · inputSchema.properties.path
Tool "list_files" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.
Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.
Location: tool list_files · inputSchema.properties.path
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
edit_filewrites fileslist_filesreads sensitive dataread_filereads sensitive datawrite_filewrites filesadd_noteno sensitive capabilityadvanced_searchno sensitive capabilityanalyze_codeno sensitive capabilityanalyze_dependenciesno sensitive capabilityanalyze_projectno sensitive capabilityapply_best_practicesno sensitive capabilityclose_edit_sessionno sensitive capabilitydetect_code_smellsno sensitive capabilitygenerate_improvement_roadmapno sensitive capabilityget_edit_suggestionsno sensitive capabilityget_metricsno sensitive capabilityget_related_filesno sensitive capabilityhealth_checkno sensitive capabilityinitialize_contextno sensitive capabilitylist_edit_sessionsno sensitive capabilitypreview_editno sensitive capabilityscaffold_featureno sensitive capabilitysearch_contextno sensitive capabilitysearch_filesno sensitive capabilitysession_apply_editno sensitive capabilitysession_redono sensitive capabilitysession_undono sensitive capabilitysmart_analyzeno sensitive capabilitysmart_editno sensitive capabilitystart_edit_sessionno sensitive capabilityupdate_contextno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.1 latest |
B 84/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan coder-mcp --online --registry pypi
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →
AI-powered software development automation toolkit using Claude Code CLI and MCP servers for intelligent code analysis, testing, and implementation workflows
Security scan results for the Coder (npm) MCP server.
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.