Cloudpanel MCP Server

cloudpanel-mcp npm v2.1.1

Published by heyjishh — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
B
82/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 82/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 89 − adoption risk = 82/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 10.6 = 89. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−9.5 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink ×2 MTC-SRC-009 injection
−1.2 Package runs install-time scripts MTC-SUP-010 supply-chain

2. Client adoption risk — 89 − 7 = 82. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([cloudpanel_export_database, cloudpanel_import_database]) and tools that can send data out ([docker_exec]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [cloudpanel_export_database, cloudpanel_import_database] → sinks [docker_exec]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow cloudpanel_export_database → docker_exec

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (build/cli.js)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`build/cli.js:16`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: (os.homedir(), ".ssh", "id_ed25519"), CP_HOST: HOST, }, }; } const PLATFORMS = [ { n

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/cli.js

high Tool "docker_exec" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "docker_exec" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool docker_exec

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/cli.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/cli.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import fs from "fs"; import path from "path"; import os from "os"; const PROJECT

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/cli.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/ssh.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/ssh.js:126`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: }); } async exec(command) { try { await this.connect(); return await this.ex

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/ssh.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (build/index.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`build/index.js:186`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: onst result = await ssh.exec(`clpctl lets-encrypt:list --domainName=${domainName} 2>/dev/null || openssl x509 -in /etc/l

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/index.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (build/ssh.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`build/ssh.js:141`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ) { return this.exec(`clpctl ${args} 2>&1`); } async checkClpctl() { try { const res

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/ssh.js

low Mutating tool "docker_exec" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "docker_exec" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool docker_exec

low Package runs install-time scripts (install)MTC-SUP-010

"cloudpanel-mcp" executes install script(s) at install time. An install hook runs at install time; most are routine build/setup, but review what it does before trusting it.

Evidence: node build/cli.js install

Fix: Review the scripts; install with --ignore-scripts where possible and vet what they do.

Location: package cloudpanel-mcp

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • cloudpanel_export_databasereads sensitive data
  • cloudpanel_import_databasereads sensitive data
  • docker_execruns code / shell
  • cloudpanel_create_backupno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_mysql_databaseno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_mysql_userno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_nodejs_siteno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_php_siteno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_postgresql_databaseno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_python_siteno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • cloudpanel_create_reverse_proxy_siteno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_static_siteno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_create_userno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_delete_backupno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_delete_mysql_databaseno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_delete_mysql_userno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_delete_siteno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_delete_userno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_disable_2fano sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_enable_2fano sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_install_sslno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_list_backupsno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_list_sitesno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_list_ssl_certificatesno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_list_usersno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_raw_commandno sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_system_infono sensitive capability
  • cloudpanel_system_updateno sensitive capability
  • deploy_projectno sensitive capability
  • docker_container_logsno sensitive capability
  • docker_deploy_composeno sensitive capability
  • docker_list_containersno sensitive capability
  • docker_list_imagesno sensitive capability
  • docker_load_imageno sensitive capability
  • docker_loginno sensitive capability
  • docker_pruneno sensitive capability
  • docker_restart_containerno sensitive capability
  • docker_stop_containerno sensitive capability
  • server_dns_checkno sensitive capability
  • server_firewall_allow_portno sensitive capability
  • server_firewall_statusno sensitive capability
  • server_install_certbotno sensitive capability
  • server_install_dockerno sensitive capability
  • server_install_mysqlno sensitive capability
  • server_install_nginxno sensitive capability
  • server_install_nodejsno sensitive capability
  • server_install_postgresqlno sensitive capability
  • server_install_redisno sensitive capability
  • server_software_statusno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.1.1 latest B 82/100 9 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 82/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cloudpanel-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cloudpanel-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cloudpanel-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cloudpanel-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cloudpanel-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan cloudpanel-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Databases