Cloud Cost MCP Server
cloud-cost-mcp
npm
v1.3.8
Published by jasonwilbur — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Multi-cloud pricing comparison MCP server for AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 31
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
refresh_aws_ec2_pricingingests untrusted inputrefresh_aws_rds_pricingingests untrusted inputrefresh_azure_full_pricingingests untrusted inputrefresh_azure_pricingingests untrusted inputrefresh_gcp_pricingingests untrusted inputrefresh_oci_pricingingests untrusted inputcalculate_workload_costno sensitive capabilitycheck_api_statusno sensitive capabilitycompare_computeno sensitive capabilitycompare_egressno sensitive capability
Show 21 more tools ↓
compare_gpu_shapesno sensitive capabilitycompare_kubernetesno sensitive capabilitycompare_storageno sensitive capabilityestimate_migration_savingsno sensitive capabilityfind_cheapest_computeno sensitive capabilityget_aws_lightsail_pricingno sensitive capabilityget_data_freshnessno sensitive capabilityget_gpu_shape_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_provider_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_storage_summaryno sensitive capabilitylist_aws_instance_familiesno sensitive capabilitylist_aws_regionsno sensitive capabilitylist_azure_categoriesno sensitive capabilitylist_azure_regionsno sensitive capabilitylist_gcp_instance_familiesno sensitive capabilitylist_gcp_regionsno sensitive capabilitylist_gpu_shapesno sensitive capabilitylist_oci_categoriesno sensitive capabilitylist_presetsno sensitive capabilityquick_estimateno sensitive capabilityrecommend_gpu_shapeno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (31 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.3.8 latest |
A 96/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan cloud-cost-mcp --onlineMore in Cloud & DevOps
Operator control CLI for AdGuard Home with an MCP adapter
interacting with Aliyun (Alibaba Cloud) services through This MCP server provides tools.
MCP server for the Aspro.Cloud REST API
MCP server for Atlassian Confluence and Jira Cloud APIs
AuroraCloud-first MCP server that exposes AuroraDocs workspace data to Claude Desktop and other AI agents
The official AWS Knowledge Base retrieval server using Bedrock Agent Runtime.