Claude Collider MCP Server

claude-collider npm v0.1.1

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

MCP server for live coding music with SuperCollider

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/process.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/process.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import { EventEmitter } from "events"; import { debug } from "./debug.js"; impor

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/process.js

Tools 31

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • fx_bypassno sensitive capability
  • fx_chainno sensitive capability
  • fx_connectno sensitive capability
  • fx_listno sensitive capability
  • fx_loadno sensitive capability
  • fx_removeno sensitive capability
  • fx_routeno sensitive capability
  • fx_route_triggerno sensitive capability
  • fx_setno sensitive capability
  • fx_sidechainno sensitive capability
Show 21 more tools ↓
  • midi_clearno sensitive capability
  • midi_connectno sensitive capability
  • midi_list_devicesno sensitive capability
  • midi_map_ccno sensitive capability
  • midi_map_notesno sensitive capability
  • recording_startno sensitive capability
  • recording_statusno sensitive capability
  • recording_stopno sensitive capability
  • routing_debugno sensitive capability
  • sample_freeno sensitive capability
  • sample_listno sensitive capability
  • sample_playno sensitive capability
  • sample_reloadno sensitive capability
  • sc_audio_devicesno sensitive capability
  • sc_bootno sensitive capability
  • sc_clearno sensitive capability
  • sc_executeno sensitive capability
  • sc_rebootno sensitive capability
  • sc_statusno sensitive capability
  • sc_stopno sensitive capability
  • sc_tempono sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.1 latest A 92/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-08

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-collider/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-collider)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-collider"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-collider/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-collider/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan claude-collider --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Design & Media