Claude Chrome Parallel MCP Server

claude-chrome-parallel npm v1.0.1

Published by shaun0927 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chrome/launcher.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chrome/launcher.js:41`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: etChromeLauncher; const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); const path = __importStar(require("path")); const fs

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chrome/launcher.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli/claude-session.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/claude-session.js:49`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: r(require("os")); const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); const BASE_DIR = path.join(os.homedir(), '.claude-ch

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/claude-session.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/index.js:56`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: r(require("os")); const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); const update_check_1 = require("./update-check"); co

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli/uninstall.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/uninstall.js:43`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: r(require("os")); const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); /** * Get the installation directory */ function g

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/uninstall.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/lightpanda/launcher.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/lightpanda/launcher.js:40`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: auncher = void 0; const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); const puppeteer = __importStar(require("puppeteer-co

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/lightpanda/launcher.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/cli/install.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/cli/install.js:44`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: r(require("os")); const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); /** * Get the installation directory */ function g

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/install.js

Tools 47

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • batch_executeno sensitive capability
  • ccp_stopno sensitive capability
  • click_elementno sensitive capability
  • computerno sensitive capability
  • console_captureno sensitive capability
  • cookiesno sensitive capability
  • drag_dropno sensitive capability
  • emulate_deviceno sensitive capability
  • execute_planno sensitive capability
  • file_uploadno sensitive capability
Show 37 more tools ↓
  • fill_formno sensitive capability
  • findno sensitive capability
  • form_inputno sensitive capability
  • geolocationno sensitive capability
  • http_authno sensitive capability
  • javascript_toolno sensitive capability
  • lightweight_scrollno sensitive capability
  • memory_queryno sensitive capability
  • memory_recordno sensitive capability
  • memory_validateno sensitive capability
  • navigateno sensitive capability
  • networkno sensitive capability
  • page_contentno sensitive capability
  • page_pdfno sensitive capability
  • page_reloadno sensitive capability
  • performance_metricsno sensitive capability
  • read_pageno sensitive capability
  • request_interceptno sensitive capability
  • selector_queryno sensitive capability
  • storageno sensitive capability
  • tabs_closeno sensitive capability
  • tabs_context_mcpno sensitive capability
  • tabs_create_mcpno sensitive capability
  • user_agentno sensitive capability
  • wait_and_clickno sensitive capability
  • wait_forno sensitive capability
  • worker_completeno sensitive capability
  • worker_createno sensitive capability
  • worker_deleteno sensitive capability
  • worker_listno sensitive capability
  • worker_updateno sensitive capability
  • workflow_cleanupno sensitive capability
  • workflow_collectno sensitive capability
  • workflow_collect_partialno sensitive capability
  • workflow_initno sensitive capability
  • workflow_statusno sensitive capability
  • xpath_queryno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.1 latest A 93/100 6 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-chrome-parallel/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-chrome-parallel)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-chrome-parallel"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-chrome-parallel/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/claude-chrome-parallel/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan claude-chrome-parallel --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools