ciso-assistant-api
PyPI
v1.0.1
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 2 = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
ciso_assistant_analytics_metrologyno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_api_requestno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_assetsno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_auth_usersno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_chatno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_complianceno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_crqno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_ebios_rmno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_evidenceno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_frameworks_librariesno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_governanceno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_incidentsno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_integrationsno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_privacyno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_resilienceno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_risk_managementno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_security_findingsno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_settingsno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_tasks_timelineno sensitive capabilityciso_assistant_third_partyno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.1 latest |
A 98/100 | 0 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan ciso-assistant-api --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.