@chrischall/gemini-mcp
npm
v1.13.0
Source verified
Published by chrischall — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
Gemini image-generation MCP server for Claude — developed and maintained by AI (Claude Code)
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tools that read sensitive data ([gemini_list_files]) and tools that can send data out ([gemini_upload_file]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.
Evidence: sources [gemini_list_files] → sinks [gemini_upload_file]
Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.
Location: flow gemini_list_files → gemini_upload_file
In the server's implementation (`dist/bundle.js:26379`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.default.scope}`, sourceCode); const v
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/bundle.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/bundle.js:33114`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; import { readFile as readFile2, unlink }
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/bundle.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/clipboard.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFile } from 'node:child_process'; import { promisify } from 'node:util'; import { readFile, unlink } from 'node:fs
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/clipboard.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/shared.js:635`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: the macOS clipboard via child_process)'); if (args.video_path) unavailable.push('`video_path` (uploads a fil
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/tools/shared.js
Tool "gemini_delete_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "delete_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool gemini_delete_file
Tool "gemini_delete_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool gemini_delete_file
Tool "gemini_delete_file" takes a path parameter "file_uri" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.
Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.
Location: tool gemini_delete_file · inputSchema.properties.file_uri
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
gemini_delete_filewrites filesgemini_list_filesreads sensitive datagemini_upload_filenetwork egressgemini_delete_characterno sensitive capabilitygemini_delete_styleno sensitive capabilitygemini_get_resultno sensitive capabilitygemini_get_upload_urlno sensitive capabilitygemini_image_editno sensitive capabilitygemini_image_generateno sensitive capabilitygemini_image_setno sensitive capabilitygemini_interactno sensitive capabilitygemini_list_charactersno sensitive capabilitygemini_list_modelsno sensitive capabilitygemini_list_recent_mediano sensitive capabilitygemini_list_stylesno sensitive capabilitygemini_music_generateno sensitive capabilitygemini_save_characterno sensitive capabilitygemini_save_styleno sensitive capabilitygemini_sign_mediano sensitive capabilitygemini_token_usageno sensitive capabilitygemini_video_generateno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.13.0 latest |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
v1.12.0 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-31 |
v1.11.1 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-30 |
v1.10.0 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-28 |
v1.9.0 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
v1.8.0 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-23 |
v1.7.0 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-22 |
v1.6.2 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-18 |
v1.6.1 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-16 |
v1.5.1 |
A 94/100 | 8 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @chrischall/gemini-mcp --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 16 side by side →
A thin, stdio Model Context Protocol (MCP) server exposing the Google Gemini API as composable primitives: chat, web search, role-based agents, multimodal analysis, image generation, code execution, and file management.
Gemini MCP Server
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Google Gemini 2.5 Pro with conversation context management
MCP server for Google Gemini API integration
MCP server for Gemini 3.1 Pro focused on UI generation and frontend development
MCP server for Gemini CLI integration
Turn designs into shipped parts: quote 3D printing, CNC, and decals, then check out.
Aleph's official SiliconFlow media-generation MCP server (image / video / TTS)
MCP server for image generation using Google Gemini AI
Ambience AI MCP Server - Generate images, videos, and audio through Model Context Protocol
MCP server exposing every endpoint of the AstroWay Calculation API as tools — natal, synastry, transits, Vedic dashas, Tarot, Numerology, Human Design, AI horoscopes — for Claude Desktop, Cursor and any MCP-compatible AI agent.
Audio-guide and trip-planning tools for 1,100+ cities from Audiala. Free, no API key.