Peculium Wallet MCP Server

@chainvue/peculium-wallet npm v0.2.3 Source verified

Published by chainvue — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
publisher verification (provenance) — cryptographic build provenance ties the artifact to its source
inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: wallet_paid_fetch → wallet_spending_report. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow wallet_paid_fetch → wallet_spending_report

low Unconstrained path parameter "path" on "wallet_paid_fetch"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "wallet_paid_fetch" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool wallet_paid_fetch · inputSchema.properties.path

Tools 11

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • wallet_paid_fetchingests untrusted inputreads sensitive data
  • wallet_spending_reportnetwork egress
  • wallet_balanceno sensitive capability
  • wallet_financial_positionno sensitive capability
  • wallet_list_recipientsno sensitive capability
  • wallet_precheckno sensitive capability
  • wallet_prepaid_balanceno sensitive capability
  • wallet_receive_addressno sensitive capability
  • wallet_sendno sensitive capability
  • wallet_topup_facilitatorno sensitive capability
  • wallet_transaction_statusno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.3 latest A 94/100 2 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/chainvue-peculium-wallet/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/chainvue-peculium-wallet)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/chainvue-peculium-wallet"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/chainvue-peculium-wallet/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/chainvue-peculium-wallet/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @chainvue/peculium-wallet --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Finance & Commerce