Cdp Toolkit MCP Server

cdp-toolkit npm v1.0.0

Published by sblattj — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 7

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:1659`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir as mkdir6, readFile as readFile4, stat as stat2 } from "node:fs/p

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:1657`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir as mkdir6, readFile as readFile4, stat as stat2 } from "node:fs/p

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/mcp.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/mcp.js:1659`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir as mkdir6, readFile as readFile4, stat as stat2 } from "node:fs/p

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/mcp.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/tools/lighthouse.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/tools/lighthouse.ts:15`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir, readFile, stat } from "node:fs/promises"; import { CdpError } fr

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/tools/lighthouse.ts

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([navigate_page, wait_for, evaluate_script, list_console_messages, list_network_requests, get_network_request, performance_start_trace, mock_request]) co-exist with external-action tools ([upload_file]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [navigate_page, wait_for, evaluate_script, list_console_messages, list_network_requests, get_network_request, performance_start_trace, mock_request] →

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow navigate_page → upload_file

medium Unconstrained URL/host parameter "url" on "navigate_page"MTC-CAP-007

Tool "navigate_page" takes a URL/host parameter "url" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).

Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.

Location: tool navigate_page · inputSchema.properties.url

medium Unconstrained URL/host parameter "url" on "get_network_request"MTC-CAP-007

Tool "get_network_request" takes a URL/host parameter "url" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).

Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.

Location: tool get_network_request · inputSchema.properties.url

Tools 34

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • evaluate_scriptingests untrusted input
  • get_network_requestingests untrusted input
  • list_console_messagesingests untrusted input
  • list_network_requestsingests untrusted input
  • mock_requestingests untrusted input
  • navigate_pageingests untrusted input
  • performance_start_traceingests untrusted input
  • upload_filenetwork egress
  • wait_foringests untrusted input
  • clear_mocksno sensitive capability
Show 24 more tools ↓
  • clickno sensitive capability
  • close_pageno sensitive capability
  • dragno sensitive capability
  • emulateno sensitive capability
  • fillno sensitive capability
  • fill_formno sensitive capability
  • get_console_messageno sensitive capability
  • handle_dialogno sensitive capability
  • hoverno sensitive capability
  • lighthouse_auditno sensitive capability
  • list_mocksno sensitive capability
  • list_pagesno sensitive capability
  • new_pageno sensitive capability
  • performance_analyze_insightno sensitive capability
  • performance_stop_traceno sensitive capability
  • performance_traceno sensitive capability
  • prefers-color-schemeno sensitive capability
  • press_keyno sensitive capability
  • resize_pageno sensitive capability
  • select_pageno sensitive capability
  • take_heapsnapshotno sensitive capability
  • take_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • take_snapshotno sensitive capability
  • type_textno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.0 latest A 93/100 7 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cdp-toolkit/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cdp-toolkit)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cdp-toolkit"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cdp-toolkit/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/cdp-toolkit/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan cdp-toolkit --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools