cdp-toolkit
npm
v1.0.0
Published by sblattj — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli.js:1659`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir as mkdir6, readFile as readFile4, stat as stat2 } from "node:fs/p
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:1657`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir as mkdir6, readFile as readFile4, stat as stat2 } from "node:fs/p
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/index.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/mcp.js:1659`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir as mkdir6, readFile as readFile4, stat as stat2 } from "node:fs/p
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/mcp.js
In the server's implementation (`src/tools/lighthouse.ts:15`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdir, readFile, stat } from "node:fs/promises"; import { CdpError } fr
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/tools/lighthouse.ts
Untrusted-input tools ([navigate_page, wait_for, evaluate_script, list_console_messages, list_network_requests, get_network_request, performance_start_trace, mock_request]) co-exist with external-action tools ([upload_file]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [navigate_page, wait_for, evaluate_script, list_console_messages, list_network_requests, get_network_request, performance_start_trace, mock_request] →
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow navigate_page → upload_file
Tool "navigate_page" takes a URL/host parameter "url" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).
Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.
Location: tool navigate_page · inputSchema.properties.url
Tool "get_network_request" takes a URL/host parameter "url" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).
Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.
Location: tool get_network_request · inputSchema.properties.url
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
evaluate_scriptingests untrusted inputget_network_requestingests untrusted inputlist_console_messagesingests untrusted inputlist_network_requestsingests untrusted inputmock_requestingests untrusted inputnavigate_pageingests untrusted inputperformance_start_traceingests untrusted inputupload_filenetwork egresswait_foringests untrusted inputclear_mocksno sensitive capabilityclickno sensitive capabilityclose_pageno sensitive capabilitydragno sensitive capabilityemulateno sensitive capabilityfillno sensitive capabilityfill_formno sensitive capabilityget_console_messageno sensitive capabilityhandle_dialogno sensitive capabilityhoverno sensitive capabilitylighthouse_auditno sensitive capabilitylist_mocksno sensitive capabilitylist_pagesno sensitive capabilitynew_pageno sensitive capabilityperformance_analyze_insightno sensitive capabilityperformance_stop_traceno sensitive capabilityperformance_traceno sensitive capabilityprefers-color-schemeno sensitive capabilitypress_keyno sensitive capabilityresize_pageno sensitive capabilityselect_pageno sensitive capabilitytake_heapsnapshotno sensitive capabilitytake_screenshotno sensitive capabilitytake_snapshotno sensitive capabilitytype_textno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.0 latest |
A 93/100 | 7 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-24 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan cdp-toolkit --online
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.