Burn MCP Server

burn-mcp-server npm v2.1.2

Published by fisher521 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Burn MCP — give your AI agent a reading workflow. 26 tools to search, triage, burn, vault, and analyze your saved articles. Works with Claude, Cursor, Windsurf.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Dynamic code execution in server code (api/mcp.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`api/mcp.js:11144`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const makeValidate = new Function(`${names_1.default.self}`, `${names_1.default.scope}`, sourceCode); const v

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server api/mcp.js

Tools 26

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • add_watched_sourceingests untrusted input
  • fetch_contentingests untrusted input
  • list_watched_sourcesingests untrusted input
  • scrape_watched_sourcesingests untrusted input
  • add_to_collectionno sensitive capability
  • batch_triage_flameno sensitive capability
  • create_collectionno sensitive capability
  • get_article_contentno sensitive capability
  • get_bookmarkno sensitive capability
  • get_collection_overviewno sensitive capability
Show 16 more tools ↓
  • get_collectionsno sensitive capability
  • get_flame_detailno sensitive capability
  • list_categoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_flameno sensitive capability
  • list_sparksno sensitive capability
  • list_vaultno sensitive capability
  • move_flame_to_ashno sensitive capability
  • move_flame_to_sparkno sensitive capability
  • move_spark_to_ashno sensitive capability
  • move_spark_to_vaultno sensitive capability
  • remove_from_collectionno sensitive capability
  • remove_watched_sourceno sensitive capability
  • search_sparksno sensitive capability
  • search_vaultno sensitive capability
  • update_collection_overviewno sensitive capability
  • write_bookmark_analysisno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.1.2 latest A 93/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v2.1.1 A 93/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-06

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/burn-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/burn-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/burn-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/burn-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/burn-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan burn-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Learning & Documentation