Browserforce MCP Server

browserforce npm v1.2.0

Published by ivalsaraj — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Give AI agents your real Chrome browser with progressive examples: simple reads, form interactions, multi-tab workflows, and state persistence. Search X and GitHub, extract ProductHunt data, test forms, compare A/B variants, monitor status pages. Works wi

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 99 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 1.2 = 99. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−1.2 Package runs install-time scripts MTC-SUP-010 supply-chain

2. Client adoption risk — 99 − 7 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 14

high Dynamic evaluation of a non-literal value (mcp/src/browserforce-command-registry.js)MTC-SRC-010

In the server's implementation (`mcp/src/browserforce-command-registry.js:607`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: {what}`); }, async eval({ body, runtime, timeout }) { const code = String(body?.code ?? ''); if (!code.trim

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp/src/browserforce-command-registry.js

high Tool "exec" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "exec" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool exec

high Dynamic code execution in server code (mcp/src/browserforce-command-registry.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`mcp/src/browserforce-command-registry.js:607`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: {what}`); }, async eval({ body, runtime, timeout }) { const code = String(body?.code ?? ''); if (!code.trim

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp/src/browserforce-command-registry.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (mcp/src/exec-engine.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`mcp/src/exec-engine.js:1174`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try { userPromise = vm.runInContext(wrapExecuteCode(code), vmContext, { timeout: timeoutMs, displayError

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp/src/exec-engine.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (agent/src/chatd.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`agent/src/chatd.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { randomBytes } from 'node:crypto'; import { promises as fs } from 'node:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server agent/src/chatd.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (agent/src/codex-runner.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`agent/src/codex-runner.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import readline from 'node:readline'; function envelope({ event, runId, session

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server agent/src/codex-runner.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (bin.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`bin.js:323`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: } = await import('node:child_process'); console.log('Checking for updates...'); let update; try { update = aw

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server bin.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (mcp/src/exec-engine.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`mcp/src/exec-engine.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import vm from 'node:vm'; import { createSmartDiff, parseSearchPattern, } from

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp/src/exec-engine.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (mcp/src/openclaw-setup.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`mcp/src/openclaw-setup.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import fs from 'node:fs/promises'; import path from 'node:path'; const RELAY_PO

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server mcp/src/openclaw-setup.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (bin.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`bin.js:106`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { default: pw } = await import(pwPath); const { chromium } = pw; const cdpUrl = await getCdpUrl(); const baseUrl =

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server bin.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (cli/sessiond.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`cli/sessiond.js:59`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { default: pw } = await import(pwPath); const { chromium } = pw; const cdpUrl = await getCdpUrl(); const baseUrl =

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server cli/sessiond.js

low Mutating tool "exec" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "exec" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool exec

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (scripts/postinstall-openclaw.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/postinstall-openclaw.mjs:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { dirname, resolve } from 'node:path'; import { fileURLToPath } from 'nod

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/postinstall-openclaw.mjs

low Package runs install-time scripts (postinstall)MTC-SUP-010

"browserforce" executes postinstall script(s) at install time. An install hook runs at install time; most are routine build/setup, but review what it does before trusting it.

Evidence: node scripts/postinstall-openclaw.mjs

Fix: Review the scripts; install with --ignore-scripts where possible and vet what they do.

Location: package browserforce

Tools 4

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • execruns code / shell
  • browserforceno sensitive capability
  • helpno sensitive capability
  • resetno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.2.0 latest A 92/100 14 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v1.1.3 A 92/100 14 1.13.0 2026-09-06

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/browserforce/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/browserforce)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/browserforce"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/browserforce/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/browserforce/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan browserforce --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools