Bnbot MCP Server

bnbot-mcp-server npm v0.1.3

Published by jackleeio — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP Server for BNBOT Chrome Extension - Control Twitter/X via AI assistants like OpenClaw

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([fetch_wechat_article, fetch_tiktok_video, fetch_xiaohongshu_note, scrape_timeline, scrape_bookmarks, scrape_search_results, scrape_current_view, scrape_thread]) co-exist with external-action tools ([like_tweet, retweet, quote_tweet, follow_user, navigate_to_tweet, scrape_timeline, scrape_thread, post_tweet, submit_reply]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [fetch_wechat_article, fetch_tiktok_video, fetch_xiaohongshu_note, scrape_timeline, scrape_bookmarks, scrape_search_results, scrape_current_view, scra

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow fetch_wechat_article → like_tweet

Tools 31

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • scrape_threadingests untrusted inputnetwork egress
  • scrape_timelineingests untrusted inputnetwork egress
  • fetch_tiktok_videoingests untrusted input
  • fetch_wechat_articleingests untrusted input
  • fetch_xiaohongshu_noteingests untrusted input
  • follow_usernetwork egress
  • like_tweetnetwork egress
  • navigate_to_tweetnetwork egress
  • post_tweetnetwork egress
  • quote_tweetnetwork egress
Show 21 more tools ↓
  • retweetnetwork egress
  • scrape_bookmarksingests untrusted input
  • scrape_current_viewingests untrusted input
  • scrape_search_resultsingests untrusted input
  • submit_replynetwork egress
  • account_analyticsno sensitive capability
  • create_articleno sensitive capability
  • fill_article_bodyno sensitive capability
  • fill_article_titleno sensitive capability
  • get_current_page_infono sensitive capability
  • get_extension_statusno sensitive capability
  • navigate_to_bookmarksno sensitive capability
  • navigate_to_followingno sensitive capability
  • navigate_to_notificationsno sensitive capability
  • navigate_to_searchno sensitive capability
  • open_article_editorno sensitive capability
  • post_threadno sensitive capability
  • publish_articleno sensitive capability
  • return_to_timelineno sensitive capability
  • search_jobsno sensitive capability
  • upload_article_header_imageno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.3 latest A 96/100 1 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bnbot-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bnbot-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bnbot-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bnbot-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bnbot-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan bnbot-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Browser Automation