Blackduck Polaris (npm) MCP Server

blackduck-polaris-mcp-server npm v0.3.1

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Trust grade
A
90/100
Last scanned
Trust
A · 90/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 98 − adoption risk = 90/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 2.1 = 98. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−2.1 Package has no source repository MTC-SUP-011 supply-chain

2. Client adoption risk — 98 − 8 = 90. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−5 publisher verification (unlocatable) — no provenance and no public repository to inspect
inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([polaris_download_report]) co-exist with external-action tools ([polaris_create_issue_policy]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [polaris_download_report] → sinks [polaris_create_issue_policy]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow polaris_download_report → polaris_create_issue_policy

low Package has no source repositoryMTC-SUP-011

"blackduck-polaris-mcp-server" declares no repository URL, so its published artifact cannot be compared against reviewable source.

Fix: Prefer packages that link to public, reviewable source.

Location: package blackduck-polaris-mcp-server

Tools 67

Show each tool and what it can reach · statically extracted from the published source
  • polaris_create_issue_policynetwork egress
  • polaris_download_reportingests untrusted input
  • polaris_assign_policyno sensitive capability
  • polaris_bulk_import_reposno sensitive capability
  • polaris_cancel_testno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_api_tokenno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_applicationno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_bugtracker_configno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_groupno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_projectno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_scheduling_policyno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_service_account_tokenno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_test_artifactno sensitive capability
  • polaris_create_userno sensitive capability
  • polaris_delete_applicationno sensitive capability
  • polaris_delete_issue_policyno sensitive capability
  • polaris_delete_reportno sensitive capability
  • polaris_export_audit_logsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_export_issues_to_trackerno sensitive capability
  • polaris_generate_reportno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_audit_logsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_current_userno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_detection_historyno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_issueno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_issue_countsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_notification_preferencesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_notification_subscriptionsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_occurrence_snippetno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_remediationno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_repono sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_report_statusno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_testno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_test_commentsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_test_metricsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_triage_historyno sensitive capability
  • polaris_get_userno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_applicationsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_audit_categoriesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_branchesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_bugtracker_configsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_entitlementsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_groupsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_issue_policiesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_issuesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_occurrencesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_portfoliosno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_repo_branchesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_report_typesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_reportsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_reposno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_scheduling_policiesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_scm_providersno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_test_artifactsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_testsno sensitive capability
  • polaris_list_usersno sensitive capability
  • polaris_submit_remediation_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • polaris_test_jira_connectionno sensitive capability
  • polaris_test_repo_connectionno sensitive capability
  • polaris_triage_issueno sensitive capability
  • polaris_trigger_scanno sensitive capability
  • polaris_update_applicationno sensitive capability
  • polaris_update_bugtracker_configno sensitive capability
  • polaris_update_issue_policyno sensitive capability
  • polaris_update_notification_preferencesno sensitive capability
  • polaris_update_repono sensitive capability
  • polaris_update_userno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.1 latest A 90/100 2 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 90/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/blackduck-polaris-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/blackduck-polaris-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/blackduck-polaris-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/blackduck-polaris-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/blackduck-polaris-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan blackduck-polaris-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Blackduck Polaris 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Developer Tools