Billy MCP Server

billy-mcp npm v0.3.2

Published by thourum — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for Billy (billy.dk) accounting — connect Claude and other AI assistants to your Danish bookkeeping: invoices, bills, journal entries, trial balance, bank reconciliation. With human-approval write protection.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Read-and-egress in one tool: "attach_file"MTC-FLOW-003

Tool "attach_file" can both read sensitive data and send data to an external destination. Even without an explicit untrusted-input leg, this is a single-call data-exfiltration path if the model is ever manipulated.

Fix: Separate reading from sending; require explicit user confirmation before egress of file/secret contents.

Location: flow attach_file

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([list_files, attach_file]) and tools that can send data out ([upload_file, attach_file, execute_script]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [list_files, attach_file] → sinks [upload_file, attach_file, execute_script]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow list_files → upload_file

high Tool "execute_script" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "execute_script" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (parameter "script"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool execute_script

medium Unconstrained command parameter "script" on "execute_script"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "execute_script" takes a command-shaped parameter "script" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool execute_script · inputSchema.properties.script

low Mutating tool "execute_script" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "execute_script" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool execute_script

Tools 40

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • attach_filereads sensitive datanetwork egress
  • execute_scriptruns code / shell
  • list_filesreads sensitive data
  • upload_filenetwork egress
  • approve_invoiceno sensitive capability
  • batch_void_daybook_transactionsno sensitive capability
  • billy_raw_requestno sensitive capability
  • create_bank_paymentno sensitive capability
  • create_billno sensitive capability
  • create_contactno sensitive capability
Show 30 more tools ↓
  • create_contact_personno sensitive capability
  • create_daybook_transactionno sensitive capability
  • create_invoiceno sensitive capability
  • create_productno sensitive capability
  • delete_invoiceno sensitive capability
  • get_accountno sensitive capability
  • get_account_balancesno sensitive capability
  • get_billno sensitive capability
  • get_contactno sensitive capability
  • get_invoiceno sensitive capability
  • get_organizationno sensitive capability
  • get_productno sensitive capability
  • list_accountsno sensitive capability
  • list_attachmentsno sensitive capability
  • list_balance_modifiersno sensitive capability
  • list_bank_line_matchesno sensitive capability
  • list_bank_linesno sensitive capability
  • list_bank_paymentsno sensitive capability
  • list_billsno sensitive capability
  • list_contact_personsno sensitive capability
  • list_contactsno sensitive capability
  • list_daybook_transactionsno sensitive capability
  • list_daybooksno sensitive capability
  • list_invoicesno sensitive capability
  • list_postingsno sensitive capability
  • list_productsno sensitive capability
  • list_transactionsno sensitive capability
  • update_contactno sensitive capability
  • update_productno sensitive capability
  • void_daybook_transactionno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 2

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.2 latest A 93/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/billy-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/billy-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/billy-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/billy-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/billy-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan billy-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Finance & Commerce