Xcode (baochuquan) MCP Server

@baochuquan/xcode-mcp npm v0.2.0

Published by @baochuquan — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

MCP server for Xcode integration, installable via npx

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/tools/project/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/project/index.js:207`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: File2 } = await import("child_process"); const execFileAsync = promisify2(execFile2); await exec

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/project/index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/utils/execFile.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/utils/execFile.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execFile } from "child_process"; import { promisify } from "util"; import { CommandExecutionError } from "./error

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/utils/execFile.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/utils/external.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/utils/external.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; const pExecFile = promisify(execFile); co

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/utils/external.js

medium Tool "write_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool write_file

medium Tool "move_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "move_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "move_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool move_file

medium Tool "delete_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "delete_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "delete_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool delete_file

low Mutating tool "write_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool write_file

low Mutating tool "move_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "move_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool move_file

low Mutating tool "delete_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "delete_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool delete_file

Tools 76

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • delete_filewrites files
  • dump_swift_packagereads sensitive data
  • move_filewrites files
  • read_filereads sensitive data
  • write_filewrites files
  • add_file_to_projectno sensitive capability
  • add_project_to_workspaceno sensitive capability
  • add_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • analyze_fileno sensitive capability
  • archive_projectno sensitive capability
Show 66 more tools ↓
  • boot_simulatorno sensitive capability
  • build_projectno sensitive capability
  • build_spm_packageno sensitive capability
  • build_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • change_directoryno sensitive capability
  • check_cocoapodsno sensitive capability
  • check_file_existsno sensitive capability
  • clean_projectno sensitive capability
  • clean_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • compile_asset_catalogno sensitive capability
  • copy_fileno sensitive capability
  • create_directoryno sensitive capability
  • create_workspaceno sensitive capability
  • create_xcode_projectno sensitive capability
  • detect_active_projectno sensitive capability
  • edit_package_swiftno sensitive capability
  • export_archiveno sensitive capability
  • find_filesno sensitive capability
  • find_projectsno sensitive capability
  • generate_icon_setno sensitive capability
  • generate_swift_docsno sensitive capability
  • get_active_projectno sensitive capability
  • get_current_directoryno sensitive capability
  • get_file_infono sensitive capability
  • get_package_infono sensitive capability
  • get_project_configurationno sensitive capability
  • get_xcode_infono sensitive capability
  • init_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • install_appno sensitive capability
  • launch_appno sensitive capability
  • list_available_destinationsno sensitive capability
  • list_available_schemesno sensitive capability
  • list_booted_simulatorsno sensitive capability
  • list_directoryno sensitive capability
  • list_installed_appsno sensitive capability
  • list_project_filesno sensitive capability
  • list_simulatorsno sensitive capability
  • open_urlno sensitive capability
  • pod_deintegrateno sensitive capability
  • pod_initno sensitive capability
  • pod_installno sensitive capability
  • pod_outdatedno sensitive capability
  • pod_repo_updateno sensitive capability
  • pod_updateno sensitive capability
  • pop_directoryno sensitive capability
  • push_directoryno sensitive capability
  • remove_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • reset_simulatorno sensitive capability
  • resolve_pathno sensitive capability
  • run_lldbno sensitive capability
  • run_testsno sensitive capability
  • run_xcrunno sensitive capability
  • search_in_filesno sensitive capability
  • set_project_pathno sensitive capability
  • set_projects_base_dirno sensitive capability
  • show_swift_dependenciesno sensitive capability
  • shutdown_simulatorno sensitive capability
  • swift_package_commandno sensitive capability
  • switch_xcodeno sensitive capability
  • take_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • terminate_appno sensitive capability
  • test_spm_packageno sensitive capability
  • test_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • trace_appno sensitive capability
  • update_swift_packageno sensitive capability
  • validate_appno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.0 latest A 92/100 9 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/baochuquan-xcode-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/baochuquan-xcode-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/baochuquan-xcode-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/baochuquan-xcode-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/baochuquan-xcode-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @baochuquan/xcode-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Xcode 6

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 7 side by side →

More in Developer Tools