Azure Cloud Master MCP Server

azure-cloud-master-mcp npm v1.0.0

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

MCP server that acts as an Azure cloud engineer - plans, provisions, analyzes, and optimizes Azure resources via az CLI

Trust grade
B
86/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 86/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 86/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 8 = 86. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Tool "azure_execute_commands" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "azure_execute_commands" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "execute command" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool azure_execute_commands

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/az-executor.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/az-executor.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ckAzCliInstalled; const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); function executeAzCommand(command, timeoutMs = 60000

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/az-executor.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/az-executor.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/az-executor.ts:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; export interface AzResult { success: boolean; data: any; error

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/az-executor.ts

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (src/az-executor.ts)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`src/az-executor.ts:13`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const output = execSync(`${fullCommand} --output json`, { encoding: "utf-8", timeout:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/az-executor.ts

low Mutating tool "azure_execute_commands" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "azure_execute_commands" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool azure_execute_commands

Tools 21

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • azure_execute_commandsruns code / shell
  • azure_analyze_acrno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_aksno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_appgwno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_appservice_trafficno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_cosmosdbno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_entraidno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_iamno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_keyvaultno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_nsgno sensitive capability
Show 11 more tools ↓
  • azure_analyze_resourcesno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_sqldbno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_storageno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_vmno sensitive capability
  • azure_analyze_vnetno sensitive capability
  • azure_apply_best_practiceno sensitive capability
  • azure_check_authno sensitive capability
  • azure_cost_analysisno sensitive capability
  • azure_generate_planno sensitive capability
  • azure_list_resource_groupsno sensitive capability
  • azure_list_resourcesno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.0 latest B 86/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 86/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/azure-cloud-master-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/azure-cloud-master-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/azure-cloud-master-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/azure-cloud-master-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/azure-cloud-master-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan azure-cloud-master-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools