Aicoin MCP Server

@aicoin/aicoin-mcp npm v1.5.1

Published by @aicoin — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

AiCoin MCP Server - unified crypto market data & trading via AiCoin API + CCXT

Trust grade
B
82/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 82/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 82/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 12 = 82. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/index.js:3930`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { fileURLToPath as fileURLToPath2 } from "url"; import { dirname as dirna

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/index.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([news, ft_deploy]) co-exist with external-action tools ([twitter]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [news, ft_deploy] → sinks [twitter]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow news → twitter

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (build/index.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`build/index.js:3971`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const output = execSync( `node ${SCRIPT} ${action}${paramsArg}`, { encoding: "utf-8", timeo

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/index.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (scripts/ft-deploy.mjs)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/ft-deploy.mjs:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { randomBytes } from 'node:crypto'; const FT_DIR = resolve(process.env.H

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/ft-deploy.mjs

Tools 63

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • ft_deployingests untrusted input
  • newsingests untrusted input
  • twitternetwork egress
  • account_historyno sensitive capability
  • account_ordersno sensitive capability
  • account_statusno sensitive capability
  • airdropno sensitive capability
  • auto_tradeno sensitive capability
  • cancel_orderno sensitive capability
  • close_positionno sensitive capability
Show 53 more tools ↓
  • coin_funding_rateno sensitive capability
  • coin_futures_datano sensitive capability
  • coin_infono sensitive capability
  • coin_liquidationno sensitive capability
  • coin_open_interestno sensitive capability
  • coin_treasuryno sensitive capability
  • create_orderno sensitive capability
  • crypto_stockno sensitive capability
  • depthno sensitive capability
  • drop_radarno sensitive capability
  • exchange_fundingno sensitive capability
  • exchange_infono sensitive capability
  • exchange_market_datano sensitive capability
  • exchange_tickerno sensitive capability
  • flashno sensitive capability
  • ft_backtestno sensitive capability
  • ft_balanceno sensitive capability
  • ft_candlesno sensitive capability
  • ft_controlno sensitive capability
  • ft_force_enterno sensitive capability
  • ft_force_exitno sensitive capability
  • ft_infono sensitive capability
  • ft_pairlistno sensitive capability
  • ft_periodicno sensitive capability
  • ft_pingno sensitive capability
  • ft_profitno sensitive capability
  • ft_statsno sensitive capability
  • ft_strategyno sensitive capability
  • ft_trade_actionno sensitive capability
  • ft_tradesno sensitive capability
  • guideno sensitive capability
  • hl_advancedno sensitive capability
  • hl_fillsno sensitive capability
  • hl_liquidationno sensitive capability
  • hl_open_interestno sensitive capability
  • hl_ordersno sensitive capability
  • hl_portfoliono sensitive capability
  • hl_positionno sensitive capability
  • hl_takerno sensitive capability
  • hl_tickerno sensitive capability
  • hl_traderno sensitive capability
  • hl_whaleno sensitive capability
  • index_datano sensitive capability
  • klineno sensitive capability
  • market_infono sensitive capability
  • market_overviewno sensitive capability
  • newsflashno sensitive capability
  • order_flowno sensitive capability
  • set_trading_configno sensitive capability
  • signal_datano sensitive capability
  • signal_manageno sensitive capability
  • trading_pairno sensitive capability
  • transferno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.5.1 latest B 82/100 4 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 82/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aicoin-aicoin-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aicoin-aicoin-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aicoin-aicoin-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aicoin-aicoin-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aicoin-aicoin-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @aicoin/aicoin-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Finance & Commerce