ai4scholar-mcp
PyPI
v0.4.0
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
A MCP server for searching and downloading academic papers from multiple sources.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_biorxiv.py:9`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: response = requests.get("https://api.biorxiv.org/details/biorxiv/0/1", timeout=5) return response.s
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_biorxiv.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_crossref.py:11`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: response = requests.get("https://api.crossref.org/works?sample=1", timeout=5) return response.statu
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_crossref.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_google_scholar.py:9`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: response = requests.get("https://scholar.google.com", timeout=5) return response.status_code == 200
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_google_scholar.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_iacr.py:10`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: response = requests.get("https://eprint.iacr.org", timeout=5) return response.status_code == 200
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_iacr.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_medrxiv.py:9`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: response = requests.get("https://api.medRxiv.org/details/medrxiv/0/1", timeout=5) return response.s
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_medrxiv.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_sci_hub.py:14`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: onds response = requests.get("https://sci-hub.se", timeout=10) return response.status_code == 200 ex
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_sci_hub.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_semantic.py:12`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: e {} response = requests.get("https://ai4scholar.net/graph/v1/paper/5bbfdf2e62f0508c65ba6de9c72fe2066fd98138", h
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_semantic.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
download_arxivingests untrusted inputdownload_biorxivingests untrusted inputdownload_medrxivingests untrusted inputdownload_pdf_by_doiingests untrusted inputdownload_semanticingests untrusted inputauto_citeno sensitive capabilityget_pubmed_citationsno sensitive capabilityget_pubmed_paper_detailno sensitive capabilityget_pubmed_relatedno sensitive capabilityget_semantic_author_papersno sensitive capabilityget_semantic_citationsno sensitive capabilityget_semantic_recommendationsno sensitive capabilityget_semantic_recommendations_for_paperno sensitive capabilityget_semantic_referencesno sensitive capabilitynano_editno sensitive capabilitynano_generateno sensitive capabilityread_arxiv_paperno sensitive capabilityread_biorxiv_paperno sensitive capabilityread_medrxiv_paperno sensitive capabilityread_semantic_paperno sensitive capabilitysearch_arxivno sensitive capabilitysearch_biorxivno sensitive capabilitysearch_google_scholarno sensitive capabilitysearch_medrxivno sensitive capabilitysearch_pubmedno sensitive capabilitysearch_semanticno sensitive capabilitysearch_semantic_authorsno sensitive capabilitysearch_semantic_snippetsno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.4.0 latest |
A 95/100 | 7 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan ai4scholar-mcp --online --registry pypi
stdio compatibility bridge for the hosted AgentMail MCP server
MCP server for Alfa documentation retrieval
MCP server providing Alpine.js documentation and reference
Search the official Astro framework documentation.
MCP server providing ATAG 2.0 (Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines) guidance for authoring tool developers
Aurais Research Reader as an MCP server — paste a paper or article, get a structured read with verbatim-verified quotes + a signed Vorion proof chain (via @vorionsys/aurais-core).