Agents Remember MCP Server

agents-remember-mcp PyPI v2.9.3

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Model Context Protocol server for Agents Remember.

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 10

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/code_quality/check.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/code_quality/check.py:47`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: Result: completed = subprocess.run( command, cwd=cwd, env=dict(env), stdin=subprocess.DEVNULL, check=False

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/code_quality/check.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/kernel/git_command.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/kernel/git_command.py:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rocess[str]: return subprocess.run( ["git", "-c", f"safe.directory={repo_root.as_posix()}", *args],

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/kernel/git_command.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/kernel/git_freshness.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/kernel/git_freshness.py:42`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["git", "-c", f"safe.directory={repo_root.as_posix()}", "fetch", rem

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/kernel/git_freshness.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/kernel/memory_init.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/kernel/memory_init.py:44`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: return git result = subprocess.run( ["git", "init"], cwd=memory_root, text=True, std

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/kernel/memory_init.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/memory/carryover.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/memory/carryover.py:99`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: VNULL} ) return subprocess.run( ["git", "-c", f"safe.directory={repo.as_posix()}", *args], cwd=r

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/memory/carryover.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/memory_quality/integrity/check_missing_onboarding.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/memory_quality/integrity/check_missing_onboarding.py:161`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: cess[str]: result = subprocess.run( ["git", "-c", f"safe.directory={repo_root.as_posix()}", *args],

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/memory_quality/integrity/check_missing_onboarding.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/memory_quality/integrity/onboarding_drift_check/git_ops.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/memory_quality/integrity/onboarding_drift_check/git_ops.py:16`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rocess[str]: return subprocess.run( ["git", "-c", f"safe.directory={repo_root.as_posix()}", *args],

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/memory_quality/integrity/onboarding_drift_check/git_ops.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agents_remember/providers/cgc/seed.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agents_remember/providers/cgc/seed.py:201`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eturn None result = subprocess.run( [ "git", "-c", f"safe.directory={rep

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/providers/cgc/seed.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (src/agents_remember/benchmarks/runner_modules/commands.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`src/agents_remember/benchmarks/runner_modules/commands.py:16`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: tHub #49). result = subprocess.run( command, cwd=cwd, check=False, stdin=subprocess.

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/benchmarks/runner_modules/commands.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (src/agents_remember/benchmarks/runner_modules/execution.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`src/agents_remember/benchmarks/runner_modules/execution.py:251`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ): completed = subprocess.run( command, input=prompt_text, stdout=stdout,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agents_remember/benchmarks/runner_modules/execution.py

Tools 36

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • cgc_calleesno sensitive capability
  • cgc_callersno sensitive capability
  • cgc_complexityno sensitive capability
  • cgc_dependenciesno sensitive capability
  • cgc_symbol_searchno sensitive capability
  • cgc_visualizeno sensitive capability
  • codex_benchmark_prepareno sensitive capability
  • codex_benchmark_runno sensitive capability
  • context_packetno sensitive capability
  • drift_checkno sensitive capability
Show 26 more tools ↓
  • grepai_searchno sensitive capability
  • grepai_traceno sensitive capability
  • memory_baseline_adoptno sensitive capability
  • memory_baseline_statusno sensitive capability
  • memory_carryover_applyno sensitive capability
  • memory_carryover_planno sensitive capability
  • memory_initno sensitive capability
  • memory_quality_checkno sensitive capability
  • pingno sensitive capability
  • provider_diagnosticsno sensitive capability
  • provider_statusno sensitive capability
  • provider_watchersno sensitive capability
  • resolve_contextno sensitive capability
  • route_index_refreshno sensitive capability
  • runtime_installno sensitive capability
  • server_infono sensitive capability
  • skills_installno sensitive capability
  • worktree_abandonno sensitive capability
  • worktree_attachno sensitive capability
  • worktree_cleanupno sensitive capability
  • worktree_closeout_applyno sensitive capability
  • worktree_closeout_previewno sensitive capability
  • worktree_integrateno sensitive capability
  • worktree_startno sensitive capability
  • worktree_statusno sensitive capability
  • worktree_syncno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.9.3 latest A 92/100 10 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agents-remember-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agents-remember-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agents-remember-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agents-remember-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agents-remember-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan agents-remember-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Productivity & Workflow