Agentmesh Platform MCP Server

agentmesh-platform PyPI v3.7.0

Published by microsoft — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
C
71/100
Last scanned
Trust
C · 71/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
C Why this grade threat 78 − adoption risk = 71/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 22 = 78. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−22 Hardcoded JSON Web Token in server code MTC-SRC-008 exfiltration

2. Client adoption risk — 78 − 7 = 71. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable
inspection depth (source) — how much of the target the scan could see

Grade capped: 1 confirmed high finding → grade capped at C. A hard gate overrides the point total — no amount of clean surface buys back a confirmed catastrophe.

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 11

high Hardcoded JSON Web Token in server code (tests/test_managed_identity.py)MTC-SRC-008

A live-looking JSON Web Token is hardcoded in `tests/test_managed_identity.py:28`. Secrets in source ship to everyone who installs the package and are a direct credential leak.

Evidence: JSON Web Token: eyJh…(redacted)

Fix: Remove the secret, rotate it, and load credentials from the environment or a secret store.

Location: server tests/test_managed_identity.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agentmesh/cli/proxy.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agentmesh/cli/proxy.py:188`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.Popen(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agentmesh/cli/proxy.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agentmesh/governance/cedar.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agentmesh/governance/cedar.py:261`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agentmesh/governance/cedar.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agentmesh/governance/opa.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agentmesh/governance/opa.py:231`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agentmesh/governance/opa.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agentmesh/marketplace/sandbox.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agentmesh/marketplace/sandbox.py:222`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agentmesh/marketplace/sandbox.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/agentmesh/marketplace/sigstore_provenance.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/agentmesh/marketplace/sigstore_provenance.py:248`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/agentmesh/marketplace/sigstore_provenance.py

low Dynamic code execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_sandbox.py)MTC-SRC-001

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_sandbox.py:171`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eval(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_sandbox.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_sandbox.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_sandbox.py:180`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: exec(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_sandbox.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_server.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_server.py:413`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.run(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_server.py

low Dynamic module load from a non-literal in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_credential_lifecycle.py)MTC-SRC-005

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_credential_lifecycle.py:240`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: __import__(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_credential_lifecycle.py

low Dynamic module load from a non-literal in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_server.py)MTC-SRC-005

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_server.py:273`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: __import__(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_server.py

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v3.7.0 latest C 71/100 11 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: C · 71/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agentmesh-platform/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agentmesh-platform)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agentmesh-platform"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agentmesh-platform/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/agentmesh-platform/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan agentmesh-platform --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools