Adbpg MCP Server

adbpg-mcp-server PyPI v2.0.3

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

AnalyticDB PostgreSQL MCP Server serves as a universal interface between AI Agents and AnalyticDB PostgreSQL databases. It enables seamless communication between AI Agents and AnalyticDB PostgreSQL, helping AI Agents retrieve database metadata and execute SQL operations.

Trust grade
A
98/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 98/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Minimal
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 98/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 2 = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 22

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • adbpg_graphrag_append_decision_treeno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_graphrag_delete_decision_treeno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_graphrag_queryno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_graphrag_reset_tree_queryno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_graphrag_uploadno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_graphrag_upload_decision_treeno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_addno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_deleteno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_delete_allno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_delete_all_historyno sensitive capability
Show 12 more tools ↓
  • adbpg_llm_memory_delete_historyno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_get_allno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_get_custom_categoryno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_get_historyno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_searchno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_set_custom_categoryno sensitive capability
  • adbpg_llm_memory_updateno sensitive capability
  • analyze_tableno sensitive capability
  • execute_ddl_sqlno sensitive capability
  • execute_dml_sqlno sensitive capability
  • execute_select_sqlno sensitive capability
  • explain_queryno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.0.3 latest A 98/100 0 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 98/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/adbpg-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/adbpg-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/adbpg-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/adbpg-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/adbpg-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan adbpg-mcp-server --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Databases